To reduce the influence of money in politics

To increase the number of candidates running for office

To make elections more competitive

To ensure that all candidates have equal access to resources

Limits on individual contributions to candidates and political parties

Prohibition of soft money donations to political parties

Increased disclosure requirements for campaign spending

All of the above

It overturned the BCRA's ban on corporate and union spending in elections

It upheld the BCRA's limits on individual contributions to candidates

It ruled that political spending is a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment

It required candidates to disclose their campaign expenditures in real time

Money spent on political campaigns that is not subject to disclosure requirements

Money donated to candidates by anonymous donors

Money used to fund independent expenditures that are not coordinated with candidates

All of the above

Reduced influence of special interests in politics

Increased transparency and accountability in the political process

More competitive elections

All of the above

Difficulty in defining what constitutes a 'special interest'

Concerns about the First Amendment right to free speech

Lack of consensus among policymakers on the best approach to reform

All of the above

To enforce campaign finance laws and regulations

To provide guidance to candidates and political committees on compliance with campaign finance laws

To conduct audits of campaign finance records

All of the above

Money donated to political parties that is not subject to contribution limits

Money spent on political campaigns that is not subject to disclosure requirements

Money used to fund independent expenditures that are not coordinated with candidates

Money donated to candidates by anonymous donors

Independent expenditures are made by individuals or groups without coordination with candidates, while coordinated expenditures are made in consultation with candidates

Independent expenditures are subject to contribution limits, while coordinated expenditures are not

Independent expenditures are used to fund advertising, while coordinated expenditures are used to fund campaign staff and other campaign activities

Independent expenditures are made by political parties, while coordinated expenditures are made by candidates

The Supreme Court has ruled on the constitutionality of campaign finance laws

The Supreme Court has interpreted the meaning of campaign finance laws

The Supreme Court has set limits on campaign spending

All of the above

Matching funds are provided to candidates who agree to certain campaign finance restrictions

Matching funds are used to match small donations from individual donors

Matching funds are provided to candidates who raise a certain amount of money from individual donors

All of the above

Public financing provides candidates with a set amount of money to run their campaigns

Public financing is funded by taxpayer dollars

Public financing is available to all candidates who meet certain criteria

All of the above

Voter-owned elections are funded entirely by small donations from individual voters

Voter-owned elections use public financing to fund campaigns

Voter-owned elections allow voters to directly contribute to candidates' campaigns

All of the above

Ranked-choice voting allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference

Ranked-choice voting eliminates the need for primary elections

Ranked-choice voting ensures that the winner of an election has the support of a majority of voters

All of the above