A strong thesis statement should be arguable, meaning that it can be supported by evidence and reasoned argument. A fact, on the other hand, is not arguable because it is already known to be true.

A thesis statement serves multiple purposes in an expository essay. It introduces the topic of the essay, states the author's opinion on the topic, and provides a roadmap for the essay by indicating the main points that will be discussed.

A strong thesis statement should be arguable, meaning that it can be supported by evidence and reasoned argument. The statement "The death penalty is wrong" is not arguable because it is a statement of opinion. The statement "The death penalty is a necessary evil" is also not arguable because it is a statement of fact. The statement "The death penalty is a topic that has been debated for centuries" is not arguable because it is a statement of fact. The statement "The death penalty is a complex issue with both pros and cons" is arguable because it can be supported by evidence and reasoned argument.

A weak thesis statement is one that is too broad, too vague, or too obvious. The statement "The internet has changed the way we live" is too broad because it is not specific enough. The statement "The internet is a powerful tool" is too vague because it does not say anything about how the internet is used. The statement "The internet is a good thing" is too obvious because it is a statement of opinion that is not supported by evidence.

The best way to make a thesis statement more specific is to add more details. For example, instead of saying "The internet has changed the way we live," you could say "The internet has changed the way we communicate, learn, and shop."

You can make a thesis statement more arguable by adding more evidence, examples, and reasons. For example, instead of saying "The death penalty is wrong," you could say "The death penalty is wrong because it is cruel and unusual punishment, it is not a deterrent to crime, and it is applied in a racially discriminatory manner."

The best way to revise a thesis statement is to read it aloud, get feedback from others, and make sure it is specific, arguable, and supported by evidence.

The statement "The internet has changed the world" is too broad because it is not specific enough. It does not say anything about how the internet has changed the world. The statements "The internet has changed the way we communicate," "The internet has changed the way we learn," and "The internet has changed the way we shop" are all more specific and therefore better thesis statements.

The statement "The internet is a powerful tool" is too vague because it does not say anything about how the internet is used. The statements "The internet is a good thing," "The internet is a bad thing," and "The internet is a complex issue" are all more specific and therefore better thesis statements.

The statement "The death penalty is a controversial issue" is too obvious because it is a statement of fact that is not supported by evidence. The statements "The death penalty is a complex issue," "The death penalty is a topic that has been debated for centuries," and "The death penalty is a topic that has been studied by many experts" are all more specific and therefore better thesis statements.

The statement "The death penalty is wrong" is not supported by evidence because it is a statement of opinion. The statements "The death penalty is a necessary evil," "The death penalty is a complex issue with both pros and cons," and "The death penalty is a topic that has been debated for centuries" are all supported by evidence.

The statement "The death penalty is a topic that has been debated for centuries" is not arguable because it is a statement of fact. The statements "The death penalty is wrong," "The death penalty is a necessary evil," and "The death penalty is a complex issue with both pros and cons" are all arguable because they can be supported by evidence and reasoned argument.

The statement "The death penalty is a complex issue with both pros and cons, and it has been debated for centuries, but I believe that it is ultimately a necessary evil." is too long because it is more than one sentence. The statements "The death penalty is wrong because it is cruel and unusual punishment, it is not a deterrent to crime, and it is applied in a racially discriminatory manner.", "The death penalty is a topic that has been studied by many experts, and there is no clear consensus on whether or not it is a necessary evil.", and "The death penalty is a controversial issue that has been debated for centuries, and there are strong arguments on both sides of the issue." are all shorter and therefore better thesis statements.

The statement "The death penalty is a complex issue with both pros and cons." is not clear because it does not say anything about the author's opinion on the issue. The statements "The death penalty is wrong," "The death penalty is a necessary evil," and "The death penalty is a topic that has been debated for centuries" are all clear because they state the author's opinion on the issue.