To limit the amount of money spent on political campaigns

To increase the amount of money spent on political campaigns

To regulate the sources of campaign funding

To deregulate the sources of campaign funding

It reduces the influence of wealthy donors on elections.

It increases the influence of wealthy donors on elections.

It makes elections more competitive.

It makes elections less competitive.

It stifles free speech.

It promotes free speech.

It increases voter turnout.

It decreases voter turnout.

A law that limits the amount of money that individuals and political parties can contribute to candidates and political parties.

A law that increases the amount of money that individuals and political parties can contribute to candidates and political parties.

A law that regulates the sources of campaign funding.

A law that deregulates the sources of campaign funding.

A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that corporations have the same First Amendment rights as individuals and can therefore spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns.

A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that corporations do not have the same First Amendment rights as individuals and cannot spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns.

A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that unions have the same First Amendment rights as individuals and can therefore spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns.

A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that unions do not have the same First Amendment rights as individuals and cannot spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns.

It has made campaign finance reform more difficult.

It has made campaign finance reform easier.

It has had no impact on campaign finance reform.

It is too early to tell what impact it will have on campaign finance reform.

A bill that would require super PACs and other outside groups to disclose the names of their donors.

A bill that would prohibit super PACs and other outside groups from spending money on political campaigns.

A bill that would provide public financing for congressional elections.

A bill that would overturn the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Supreme Court case.

It increases voter turnout.

It decreases voter turnout.

It has no impact on voter turnout.

It is too early to tell what impact it will have on voter turnout.

The influence of wealthy donors.

The influence of special interests.

The First Amendment.

All of the above.

Reducing the influence of wealthy donors and special interests on elections.

Making elections more competitive.

Increasing voter turnout.

All of the above.

It could stifle free speech.

It could make elections less competitive.

It could decrease voter turnout.

All of the above.

Limiting the amount of money that individuals and political parties can contribute to candidates and political parties.

Regulating the sources of campaign funding.

Requiring super PACs and other outside groups to disclose the names of their donors.

All of the above.

Passing legislation.

Amending the Constitution.

Through the courts.

All of the above.

It is uncertain.

It is likely to be achieved in the near future.

It is likely to be achieved in the distant future.

It is unlikely to be achieved.

Contact your elected officials and let them know that you support campaign finance reform.

Donate to organizations that are working to achieve campaign finance reform.

Volunteer for campaigns that are working to achieve campaign finance reform.

All of the above.