To select the party's presidential candidate.

To select the party's candidates for other elected offices.

To develop the party's platform.

To raise money for the party.

Open primaries and closed primaries.

Direct primaries and indirect primaries.

Winner-take-all primaries and proportional primaries.

Same-day primaries and early voting primaries.

In a direct primary, voters vote directly for the party's candidates, while in an indirect primary, voters vote for delegates who will then select the party's candidates.

In a direct primary, voters vote for the party's candidates in a single election, while in an indirect primary, voters vote for the party's candidates in multiple elections.

In a direct primary, voters vote for the party's candidates in a secret ballot, while in an indirect primary, voters vote for the party's candidates in a public ballot.

In a direct primary, voters vote for the party's candidates in a single state, while in an indirect primary, voters vote for the party's candidates in multiple states.

A primary in which the candidate who receives the most votes wins all of the delegates.

A primary in which the candidate who receives the most votes wins a majority of the delegates.

A primary in which the candidate who receives the most votes wins a plurality of the delegates.

A primary in which the candidate who receives the most votes wins a proportional share of the delegates.

A primary in which the candidate who receives the most votes wins all of the delegates.

A primary in which the candidate who receives the most votes wins a majority of the delegates.

A primary in which the candidate who receives the most votes wins a plurality of the delegates.

A primary in which the candidate who receives the most votes wins a proportional share of the delegates.

They allow voters to vote for the best candidate, regardless of party affiliation.

They increase voter turnout.

They make it easier for third-party candidates to win elections.

All of the above.

They can lead to more extreme candidates being nominated.

They can make it more difficult for parties to maintain their identity.

They can lead to more split-ticket voting.

All of the above.

They prevent voters from voting for candidates from other parties.

They make it easier for parties to maintain their identity.

They reduce the likelihood of split-ticket voting.

All of the above.

They can lead to lower voter turnout.

They can make it more difficult for third-party candidates to win elections.

They can lead to more extreme candidates being nominated.

All of the above.

Eliminating primaries altogether and using a caucus system instead.

Adopting a national primary system.

Using ranked-choice voting in primaries.

All of the above.

Caucuses are more democratic because they allow all party members to participate.

Caucuses are more efficient because they can be held in a single day.

Caucuses are less expensive to administer than primaries.

All of the above.

Caucuses are less accessible to voters than primaries.

Caucuses are more susceptible to fraud and manipulation.

Caucuses are less transparent than primaries.

All of the above.

A national primary system would make the primary process more fair and democratic.

A national primary system would reduce the influence of special interests in the primary process.

A national primary system would make it easier for third-party candidates to win elections.

All of the above.

A national primary system would be too expensive to administer.

A national primary system would give too much power to the federal government.

A national primary system would make it more difficult for states to tailor their primary systems to their own needs.

All of the above.

Ranked-choice voting would make it more likely that the candidate who is most preferred by the majority of voters wins the primary.

Ranked-choice voting would reduce the likelihood of spoiler candidates winning the primary.

Ranked-choice voting would make it easier for third-party candidates to win elections.

All of the above.

Ranked-choice voting is too complicated for voters to understand.

Ranked-choice voting is more expensive to administer than traditional voting methods.

Ranked-choice voting can lead to more runoff elections.

All of the above.