Contextual criticism focuses on the historical, cultural, and social context in which a historical text was created, arguing that this context is essential for understanding the text's meaning and significance.

Textual criticism aims to identify and correct errors that may have crept into a historical text during its transmission and copying over time.

Ideological criticism examines how ideology and power structures influence the writing and interpretation of history, arguing that historical narratives are often shaped by the interests and perspectives of those in power.

Source criticism evaluates the reliability and trustworthiness of historical sources, considering factors such as the author's bias, the purpose of the source, and the circumstances under which it was created.

Intentionalist criticism seeks to understand the author's intention or purpose in writing a historical text, arguing that this intention is essential for interpreting the text's meaning.

Contextual criticism examines the historical, cultural, and social context in which a historical text was created, arguing that this context is essential for understanding the text's meaning and significance.

Linguistic criticism analyzes the language and style of a historical text, arguing that these elements can provide insights into the author's intention, the historical context, and the meaning of the text.

Textual criticism evaluates the authenticity of historical sources, considering factors such as the age of the document, the presence of alterations or interpolations, and the consistency of the text with other known sources.

Contextual criticism examines the historical, cultural, and social context in which a historical text was created, arguing that this context is essential for understanding the text's meaning and significance.

Ideological criticism examines how ideology and power structures influence the writing and interpretation of history, arguing that historical narratives are often shaped by the interests and perspectives of those in power.

Intertextual criticism examines the relationship between a historical text and other texts, arguing that these relationships can provide insights into the text's meaning and significance.

Source criticism evaluates the reliability and trustworthiness of historical sources, considering factors such as the author's bias, the purpose of the source, and the circumstances under which it was created.

Intentionalist criticism seeks to understand the author's intention or purpose in writing a historical text, arguing that this intention is essential for interpreting the text's meaning.

Contextual criticism examines the historical, cultural, and social context in which a historical text was created, arguing that this context is essential for understanding the text's meaning and significance.

Linguistic criticism analyzes the language and style of a historical text, arguing that these elements can provide insights into the author's intention, the historical context, and the meaning of the text.