Aristotle's writings on meteorology, particularly his book 'Meteorology', provided a framework for understanding weather and climate phenomena, which influenced later scientific investigations.

The prevailing view in the 18th century was that climate underwent cyclical changes, with periods of warming and cooling, driven by natural factors such as variations in solar radiation.

The discovery of the greenhouse effect by John Tyndall and others in the 19th century challenged the prevailing view of climate as a cyclical phenomenon, as it provided a mechanism for human activities to influence climate through the release of greenhouse gases.

During the Renaissance period, natural philosophers primarily focused on observing and documenting weather and climate phenomena, laying the groundwork for future scientific investigations.

Johannes Kepler proposed the idea that the Earth's climate is influenced by the Sun's activity, suggesting that variations in solar radiation could lead to changes in climate.

In the 17th century, natural philosophers primarily focused on developing theories to explain the causes of climate change, rather than conducting experiments or collecting data.

René Descartes argued that climate change is a natural phenomenon that has occurred throughout Earth's history, and that human activities are not the primary cause of climate change.

In the 18th century, natural philosophers primarily relied on field observations to study climate, as instrumental measurements and mathematical modeling were not yet widely used.

Isaac Newton proposed the idea that the Earth's climate is influenced by the Earth's rotation and the distribution of land and sea, suggesting that these factors could lead to variations in climate.

During the Enlightenment period, natural philosophers primarily focused on observing and documenting weather and climate phenomena, laying the groundwork for future scientific investigations.

Johannes Kepler proposed the idea that the Earth's climate is influenced by the Earth's orbit around the Sun, suggesting that variations in the Earth's distance from the Sun could lead to changes in climate.

In the 16th century, natural philosophers primarily focused on developing theories to explain the causes of climate change, rather than conducting experiments or collecting data.

Thomas Hobbes argued that climate change is a result of divine intervention, suggesting that it is beyond human understanding and control.

In the 17th century, natural philosophers primarily relied on field observations to study climate, as instrumental measurements and mathematical modeling were not yet widely used.

Isaac Newton proposed the idea that the Earth's climate is influenced by the Earth's magnetic field, suggesting that variations in the magnetic field could lead to changes in climate.