A presidential veto is a formal rejection by the President of a bill passed by Congress. The President has ten days (excluding Sundays) to sign or veto a bill. If the President does not sign the bill within ten days, it becomes law without the President's signature. If the President vetoes the bill, it is returned to Congress. Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

There are two types of presidential vetoes: regular vetoes and pocket vetoes. A regular veto is a formal rejection of a bill by the President. A pocket veto occurs when the President does not sign a bill within ten days (excluding Sundays) of receiving it. If the President does not sign the bill within ten days, it is considered to have been pocket vetoed and becomes law without the President's signature.

A line-item veto is the ability of the President to veto specific provisions of a bill while allowing the rest of the bill to become law. The President can only use a line-item veto on bills that appropriate funds. The President cannot use a line-item veto on bills that raise taxes or change tax laws.

Andrew Jackson was the first President to use the line-item veto. He used it twice during his presidency, in 1832 and 1833. The Supreme Court later ruled that the line-item veto was unconstitutional.

Bill Clinton was the last President to use the line-item veto. He used it 82 times during his presidency, from 1993 to 2001. The Supreme Court later ruled that the line-item veto was unconstitutional.

The President has used the veto power over 2,500 times since the founding of the United States. The President has used the regular veto over 1,500 times and the pocket veto over 1,000 times.

Franklin D. Roosevelt used the veto power more than any other President. He used the regular veto 635 times and the pocket veto 263 times, for a total of 898 vetoes. He used the veto power to block legislation that he believed was unconstitutional or harmful to the country.

James Monroe used the veto power the least of any President. He used the regular veto only once and the pocket veto never, for a total of one veto. He believed that the President should only use the veto power in extreme cases.

The success rate of presidential vetoes is about 95%. This means that about 95% of the time, Congress does not override a presidential veto. This is because it is very difficult to override a presidential veto. Congress needs a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate to override a veto.

Presidents veto bills for a variety of reasons. They may believe that the bill is unconstitutional, harmful to the country, or too expensive. They may also veto bills because they disagree with the policies in the bill or because they believe that the bill does not go far enough.

A presidential veto can have a number of consequences. The bill may not become law, Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or the President can pocket veto the bill. The consequences of a presidential veto depend on the specific circumstances of the case.

Congress can override a presidential veto with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This is a very difficult thing to do, which is why presidential vetoes are so successful.

A regular veto is a formal rejection of a bill by the President. The President has ten days (excluding Sundays) to sign or veto a bill. If the President does not sign the bill within ten days, it becomes law without the President's signature. If the President vetoes the bill, it is returned to Congress. Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. A pocket veto occurs when the President does not sign a bill within ten days (excluding Sundays) of receiving it. If the President does not sign the bill within ten days, it is considered to have been pocket vetoed and becomes law without the President's signature.

There are a number of arguments for and against the presidential veto power. Some people argue that the veto power is necessary to ensure that only good laws are passed. They argue that the President should have the power to veto bills that he or she believes are unconstitutional, harmful to the country, or too expensive. Others argue that the veto power gives too much power to the President. They argue that the President should not be able to single-handedly block legislation that has been passed by Congress. They also argue that the veto power can be used to delay or prevent important legislation from being passed.