The accuracy of our beliefs.

The consistency of our beliefs.

The justification of our beliefs.

The usefulness of our beliefs.

Epistemic reliability is concerned with the accuracy of our beliefs, while truth is concerned with the correspondence of our beliefs to reality.

Epistemic reliability is concerned with the justification of our beliefs, while truth is concerned with the accuracy of our beliefs.

Epistemic reliability is concerned with the consistency of our beliefs, while truth is concerned with the accuracy of our beliefs.

Epistemic reliability is concerned with the usefulness of our beliefs, while truth is concerned with the accuracy of our beliefs.

Evidence.

Reason.

Testimony.

All of the above.

Internal epistemic reliability is concerned with the accuracy of our beliefs, while external epistemic reliability is concerned with the justification of our beliefs.

Internal epistemic reliability is concerned with the consistency of our beliefs, while external epistemic reliability is concerned with the accuracy of our beliefs.

Internal epistemic reliability is concerned with the usefulness of our beliefs, while external epistemic reliability is concerned with the accuracy of our beliefs.

Internal epistemic reliability is concerned with the accuracy of our beliefs, while external epistemic reliability is concerned with the correspondence of our beliefs to reality.

Cognitive biases.

Limited information.

Conflicting evidence.

All of the above.

Be aware of our cognitive biases.

Seek out diverse sources of information.

Evaluate evidence critically.

All of the above.

Skepticism is a challenge to epistemic reliability.

Skepticism is a form of epistemic reliability.

Skepticism is unrelated to epistemic reliability.

None of the above.

A logical argument that shows that all attempts to justify our beliefs must ultimately rely on circular reasoning, infinite regress, or an unjustified assumption.

A logical argument that shows that all attempts to justify our beliefs must ultimately rely on evidence, reason, or testimony.

A logical argument that shows that all attempts to justify our beliefs must ultimately rely on intuition, faith, or revelation.

None of the above.

A philosophical problem that shows that justified true belief is not sufficient for knowledge.

A philosophical problem that shows that justified true belief is necessary for knowledge.

A philosophical problem that shows that justified true belief is both necessary and sufficient for knowledge.

None of the above.

A philosophical problem that shows that knowledge is not possible.

A philosophical problem that shows that knowledge is only possible in certain limited domains.

A philosophical problem that shows that knowledge is possible, but it is not always reliable.

None of the above.

A philosophical paradox that shows that it is possible to have justified true belief without knowledge.

A philosophical paradox that shows that it is impossible to have justified true belief without knowledge.

A philosophical paradox that shows that it is possible to have knowledge without justified true belief.

None of the above.

A philosophical paradox that shows that it is possible to know that one knows something without actually knowing it.

A philosophical paradox that shows that it is impossible to know that one knows something without actually knowing it.

A philosophical paradox that shows that it is possible to know something without knowing that one knows it.

None of the above.

A philosophical problem that shows that induction is not a reliable method for acquiring knowledge.

A philosophical problem that shows that induction is a reliable method for acquiring knowledge.

A philosophical problem that shows that induction is sometimes reliable and sometimes unreliable.

None of the above.

A philosophical problem that shows that it is difficult to distinguish between science and pseudoscience.

A philosophical problem that shows that it is easy to distinguish between science and pseudoscience.

A philosophical problem that shows that science and pseudoscience are the same thing.

None of the above.

A philosophical problem that shows that the existence of evil is incompatible with the existence of an all-powerful, all-good God.

A philosophical problem that shows that the existence of evil is compatible with the existence of an all-powerful, all-good God.

A philosophical problem that shows that the existence of evil is irrelevant to the existence of an all-powerful, all-good God.

None of the above.