The Five Ways of Proving the Existence of God Online Test

Back

0

The Five Ways of Proving the Existence of God

Description: The Five Ways of Proving the Existence of God is a series of arguments developed by Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century to demonstrate the existence of God. The arguments are based on observations of the natural world and human experience.
Number of Questions: 14
Created by: Aliensbrain Bot
Tags: philosophy medieval philosophy the five ways of proving the existence of god

Start the Quiz

Which of the following is not one of the Five Ways of Proving the Existence of God?

The Argument from Motion
The Argument from First Cause
The Argument from Contingent Beings
The Argument from Design
The Argument from Moral Law

The Argument from Motion states that:

Everything that is in motion is moved by something else.
There must be a first mover who is unmoved.
The universe is eternal and has always existed.
The laws of physics are constant and unchanging.
The universe is governed by chance and randomness.

The Argument from First Cause states that:

Every effect has a cause.
There must be a first cause who is uncaused.
The universe is self-caused and has no beginning.
The laws of physics are the ultimate cause of everything.
The universe is a result of random chance and has no purpose.

The Argument from Contingent Beings states that:

Some things exist necessarily.
Some things exist contingently.
All things exist necessarily.
All things exist contingently.
Nothing exists.

The Argument from Design states that:

The universe is ordered and purposeful.
The universe is governed by chance and randomness.
The universe is a result of natural selection and evolution.
The universe is a product of human consciousness.
The universe is a meaningless void.

The Argument from the Existence of the Universe states that:

The universe exists.
The universe is eternal and has always existed.
The universe is a product of nothing.
The universe is a result of a random fluctuation in the quantum vacuum.
The universe is a simulation created by an advanced civilization.

Which of the following is not a criticism of the Five Ways of Proving the Existence of God?

The arguments are based on circular reasoning.
The arguments rely on unproven assumptions.
The arguments are too complex and difficult to understand.
The arguments are not relevant to modern science.
The arguments are not convincing and do not prove the existence of God.

Which of the following is a common objection to the Argument from Motion?

The argument assumes that everything that is in motion is caused by something else.
The argument does not explain what caused the first mover to move.
The argument relies on the concept of infinity, which is impossible.
The argument is based on the assumption that the universe is finite.
The argument is not relevant to modern science.

Which of the following is a common objection to the Argument from First Cause?

The argument assumes that every effect has a cause.
The argument does not explain what caused the first cause to exist.
The argument relies on the concept of infinity, which is impossible.
The argument is based on the assumption that the universe is finite.
The argument is not relevant to modern science.

Which of the following is a common objection to the Argument from Contingent Beings?

The argument assumes that some things exist contingently.
The argument does not explain why there are any necessary beings.
The argument relies on the concept of infinity, which is impossible.
The argument is based on the assumption that the universe is finite.
The argument is not relevant to modern science.

Which of the following is a common objection to the Argument from Design?

The argument assumes that the universe is ordered and purposeful.
The argument does not explain why the universe is designed the way it is.
The argument relies on the concept of infinity, which is impossible.
The argument is based on the assumption that the universe is finite.
The argument is not relevant to modern science.

Which of the following is a common objection to the Argument from the Existence of the Universe?

The argument assumes that the universe exists.
The argument does not explain why the universe exists.
The argument relies on the concept of infinity, which is impossible.
The argument is based on the assumption that the universe is finite.
The argument is not relevant to modern science.

Which of the following is the most common criticism of the Five Ways of Proving the Existence of God?

The arguments are based on circular reasoning.
The arguments rely on unproven assumptions.
The arguments are too complex and difficult to understand.
The arguments are not relevant to modern science.
The arguments are not convincing and do not prove the existence of God.

Which of the following is the most common defense of the Five Ways of Proving the Existence of God?

The arguments are based on sound logic and reason.
The arguments are consistent with the teachings of the Bible.
The arguments have been accepted by many great philosophers and theologians.
The arguments provide a strong case for the existence of God.
The arguments are the only way to prove the existence of God.

- Hide questions