That God is the only being.

That all beings are analogous to God.

That all beings are created by God.

That all beings are equal to God.

Plato

Aristotle

Thomas Aquinas

Duns Scotus

Analogy of proportionality

Analogy of attribution

Analogy of univocity

Analogy of equality

Analogy of proportionality is based on similarity of properties, while analogy of attribution is based on causal relationships.

Analogy of proportionality is based on causal relationships, while analogy of attribution is based on similarity of properties.

Analogy of proportionality is based on similarity of relationships, while analogy of attribution is based on similarity of properties.

Analogy of proportionality is based on similarity of properties, while analogy of attribution is based on similarity of relationships.

Analogy of univocity is based on the identity of properties, while analogy of equality is based on the similarity of properties.

Analogy of univocity is based on the similarity of properties, while analogy of equality is based on the identity of properties.

Analogy of univocity is based on the identity of relationships, while analogy of equality is based on the similarity of relationships.

Analogy of univocity is based on the similarity of relationships, while analogy of equality is based on the identity of relationships.

The Analogy of Being is the foundation for the transcendental properties of being.

The transcendental properties of being are the foundation for the Analogy of Being.

The Analogy of Being and the transcendental properties of being are independent of each other.

The Analogy of Being and the transcendental properties of being are identical.

The Analogy of Being is incompatible with the concept of divine simplicity.

The Analogy of Being is compatible with the concept of divine simplicity.

The Analogy of Being is identical to the concept of divine simplicity.

The Analogy of Being is independent of the concept of divine simplicity.

The Analogy of Being is incompatible with the concept of creation.

The Analogy of Being is compatible with the concept of creation.

The Analogy of Being is identical to the concept of creation.

The Analogy of Being is independent of the concept of creation.

The Analogy of Being is incompatible with the concept of providence.

The Analogy of Being is compatible with the concept of providence.

The Analogy of Being is identical to the concept of providence.

The Analogy of Being is independent of the concept of providence.

The Analogy of Being is incompatible with the concept of the beatific vision.

The Analogy of Being is compatible with the concept of the beatific vision.

The Analogy of Being is identical to the concept of the beatific vision.

The Analogy of Being is independent of the concept of the beatific vision.

It is too vague and imprecise.

It is based on a false analogy between God and creatures.

It leads to pantheism.

All of the above.

It is a useful way to understand the relationship between God and creatures.

It is based on a sound analogy between God and creatures.

It does not lead to pantheism.

All of the above.

In theology, to understand the relationship between God and the world.

In philosophy, to understand the nature of reality.

In science, to understand the relationship between the physical world and the spiritual world.

All of the above.

The rise of secularism.

The development of new scientific theories.

The increasing diversity of religious and philosophical beliefs.

All of the above.

It will continue to be a source of inspiration and insight for theologians, philosophers, and scientists.

It will be replaced by new and more adequate ways of understanding the relationship between God and the world.

It will gradually fade into obscurity.

It is impossible to say.