To resolve differences between the two chambers' versions of a bill.

To draft new legislation from scratch.

To oversee the implementation of laws and policies.

To conduct investigations and hearings on specific issues.

Members of the legislative leadership from both chambers.

Members of the committees that originally considered the bill in each chamber.

Members of the appropriations committees from both chambers.

Members of the minority party from both chambers.

By the presiding officers of both chambers.

By the majority leaders of both chambers.

By the minority leaders of both chambers.

By the appropriations committees of both chambers.

The committee meets to discuss the differences between the two versions of the bill and attempts to reach a compromise.

The committee votes on each provision of the bill, and the majority vote determines the final version.

The committee drafts a new bill from scratch, incorporating elements from both versions.

The committee holds public hearings to gather input from stakeholders.

The bill is defeated and cannot be passed.

The bill is sent back to the chambers for further consideration.

The bill is automatically passed in the version approved by the chamber that had the most votes.

The bill is referred to a joint committee for further deliberation.

They facilitate the resolution of differences between the two chambers and ensure the passage of important legislation.

They provide an opportunity for public input and participation in the legislative process.

They help to streamline the legislative process and reduce the number of bills that are considered by the full legislature.

They provide a forum for political horse-trading and compromise between the two chambers.

The need to balance the interests of both chambers and their respective constituencies.

The time constraints imposed on the committee to reach a compromise.

The pressure from special interest groups and lobbyists to influence the outcome of the negotiations.

The lack of transparency and public accountability in the committee's proceedings.

By increasing the transparency and public accountability of the committee's proceedings.

By providing the committee with more time to deliberate and reach a compromise.

By reducing the influence of special interest groups and lobbyists on the committee's deliberations.

By requiring the committee to hold public hearings and solicit input from stakeholders.

To resolve differences between the House and Senate versions of the budget resolution.

To draft a budget resolution that is acceptable to both chambers.

To oversee the implementation of the budget resolution.

To conduct hearings on the budget and make recommendations to the full legislature.

They are undemocratic and lack transparency.

They give too much power to special interests and lobbyists.

They can lead to gridlock and prevent the passage of important legislation.

They are not subject to the same rules and procedures as other legislative committees.

Requiring conference committees to hold public hearings and solicit input from stakeholders.

Limiting the influence of special interest groups and lobbyists on conference committees.

Making conference committee proceedings more transparent and accountable.

Subjecting conference committees to the same rules and procedures as other legislative committees.

To resolve differences between the House and Senate versions of the articles of impeachment.

To draft articles of impeachment against the president or other federal officials.

To conduct hearings on the impeachment charges and make recommendations to the full legislature.

To oversee the implementation of the impeachment process.

The need to balance the interests of the House and Senate and their respective constituencies.

The time constraints imposed on the committee to reach a compromise.

The pressure from political parties and special interest groups to influence the outcome of the negotiations.

The lack of transparency and public accountability in the committee's proceedings.

By increasing the transparency and public accountability of the committee's proceedings.

By providing the committee with more time to deliberate and reach a compromise.

By reducing the influence of political parties and special interest groups on the committee's deliberations.

By requiring the committee to hold public hearings and solicit input from stakeholders.