A license that is granted by a court of law.

A license that is created by operation of law.

A license that is agreed upon by the parties.

A license that is granted by the government.

Shop rights and equitable licenses.

Estoppel licenses and promissory licenses.

Implied-in-fact licenses and implied-in-law licenses.

Non-exclusive licenses and exclusive licenses.

A license that is created by the conduct of the parties.

A license that is created by a court of law.

A license that is agreed upon by the parties.

A license that is granted by the government.

A license that is created by a court of law.

A license that is created by the conduct of the parties.

A license that is agreed upon by the parties.

A license that is granted by the government.

Permission, knowledge, and consideration.

Permission, use, and benefit.

Permission, knowledge, and use.

Permission, knowledge, and benefit.

Necessity, unjust enrichment, and estoppel.

Necessity, benefit, and estoppel.

Necessity, knowledge, and estoppel.

Necessity, use, and estoppel.

Implied-in-fact licenses are created by the conduct of the parties, while implied-in-law licenses are created by a court of law.

Implied-in-fact licenses are created by a court of law, while implied-in-law licenses are created by the conduct of the parties.

Implied-in-fact licenses are created by an express agreement, while implied-in-law licenses are created by operation of law.

Implied-in-fact licenses are created by operation of law, while implied-in-law licenses are created by an express agreement.

A customer who brings a car to a mechanic for repairs has an implied-in-fact license to use the mechanic's tools.

A tenant who rents an apartment has an implied-in-fact license to use the landlord's common areas.

A student who enrolls in a college course has an implied-in-fact license to use the college's library.

All of the above.

A person who is forced to enter another person's property to save their own life has an implied-in-law license to do so.

A person who is unjustly enriched by the use of another person's property has an implied-in-law license to continue using the property.

A person who is estopped from denying the existence of a license has an implied-in-law license.

All of the above.

They allow the parties to avoid the need for a formal agreement.

They are more flexible than express licenses.

They are less expensive than express licenses.

All of the above.

They can be difficult to prove.

They can be difficult to enforce.

They can be terminated at any time by either party.

All of the above.

By the parties' mutual agreement.

By the occurrence of a specified event.

By the passage of time.

All of the above.

Lack of permission.

Lack of knowledge.

Lack of use.

All of the above.

Injunction.

Damages.

Rescission.

All of the above.

The relationship between the parties.

The conduct of the parties.

The surrounding circumstances.

All of the above.