Historical criticism is a method of analyzing historical sources to determine their authenticity and reliability. It involves examining the source's provenance, content, and context to assess its trustworthiness.

Natural phenomena, such as earthquakes or floods, are not considered historical sources because they are not created by humans and do not provide information about the past.

Primary sources are documents or artifacts that were created during the time period being studied, while secondary sources are documents or artifacts that were created later and are based on primary sources.

Interpretation is the process of making sense of historical evidence and constructing a narrative of the past. It involves selecting and organizing evidence, identifying patterns and relationships, and drawing conclusions.

Structuralism is a method of analyzing social and cultural phenomena that focuses on the underlying structures that shape them. It is not a school of historical thought.

Positivism is a school of historical thought that emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence and objective observation. It is often criticized for being too focused on the present and for ignoring the role of interpretation in historical research.

Marxism is a school of historical thought that emphasizes the importance of economic factors in shaping historical events. It is often criticized for being too focused on the economic and for ignoring the role of other factors, such as culture and politics.

Postmodernism is a school of historical thought that emphasizes the importance of individual experience and interpretation. It is often criticized for being too focused on the individual and for ignoring the role of objective facts in historical research.

Statistical data is not considered historical evidence because it is not created by humans and does not provide information about the past.

Historical facts are statements that are based on evidence and are generally accepted to be true. Historical interpretations are explanations of historical events that are based on the historian's own perspective and judgment.

Empathy is the ability to understand and share the feelings of another person. It is an important tool for historical researchers because it allows them to understand the motivations of historical actors and to reconstruct the past as it actually happened.

Objectivity is not a type of historical bias. It is the goal of historical research to be objective and to avoid bias.

Historical significance is based on the long-term impact of an event on the course of history, while historical importance is based on the short-term impact of an event on the lives of those who experienced it.

Historiography is the study of the history of historical writing. It examines how historians have interpreted the past and how their interpretations have changed over time.

Synthesis is not a type of historical method. It is the process of combining and interpreting historical evidence to create a narrative of the past.