0

The Judicial Review Process

Description: This quiz will test your knowledge of the judicial review process.
Number of Questions: 14
Created by:
Tags: judicial review constitutional law separation of powers
Attempted 0/14 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the purpose of judicial review?

  1. To ensure that laws are constitutional.

  2. To interpret the meaning of laws.

  3. To apply laws to specific cases.

  4. To create new laws.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Judicial review is the process by which courts determine whether laws are constitutional. This power is essential to the separation of powers and ensures that the government does not overstep its authority.

Which court has the final say on whether a law is constitutional?

  1. The Supreme Court of the United States

  2. The federal circuit courts of appeals

  3. The state supreme courts

  4. The federal district courts


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the land and has the final say on whether a law is constitutional. Its decisions are binding on all other courts.

What is the doctrine of stare decisis?

  1. The principle that courts should follow precedent.

  2. The principle that courts should interpret laws narrowly.

  3. The principle that courts should interpret laws broadly.

  4. The principle that courts should create new laws.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Stare decisis is the principle that courts should follow precedent. This doctrine helps to ensure that the law is consistent and predictable.

What is the difference between facial challenges and as-applied challenges?

  1. Facial challenges challenge the constitutionality of a law on its face, while as-applied challenges challenge the constitutionality of a law as applied to a specific case.

  2. Facial challenges challenge the constitutionality of a law as applied to a specific case, while as-applied challenges challenge the constitutionality of a law on its face.

  3. Facial challenges challenge the constitutionality of a law on its face, while as-applied challenges challenge the constitutionality of a law as applied to a specific case and the constitutionality of a law on its face.

  4. Facial challenges challenge the constitutionality of a law as applied to a specific case and the constitutionality of a law on its face, while as-applied challenges challenge the constitutionality of a law as applied to a specific case.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Facial challenges challenge the constitutionality of a law on its face, meaning that they argue that the law is unconstitutional in all cases. As-applied challenges challenge the constitutionality of a law as applied to a specific case, meaning that they argue that the law is unconstitutional as applied to the specific facts of the case.

What is the standing requirement?

  1. The requirement that a person must have a personal stake in the outcome of a case in order to bring a lawsuit.

  2. The requirement that a person must be a citizen of the United States in order to bring a lawsuit.

  3. The requirement that a person must be a resident of the state in which the lawsuit is filed in order to bring a lawsuit.

  4. The requirement that a person must be a member of a particular group in order to bring a lawsuit.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The standing requirement is the requirement that a person must have a personal stake in the outcome of a case in order to bring a lawsuit. This requirement ensures that only those who are directly affected by a law can challenge its constitutionality.

What is the ripeness requirement?

  1. The requirement that a case must be ready for decision before a court can hear it.

  2. The requirement that a case must be important enough for a court to hear it.

  3. The requirement that a case must be brought within a certain amount of time after the alleged harm occurred.

  4. The requirement that a case must be brought in the proper court.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The ripeness requirement is the requirement that a case must be ready for decision before a court can hear it. This requirement ensures that courts do not decide cases that are hypothetical or abstract.

What is the mootness doctrine?

  1. The doctrine that a case becomes moot when the issue in the case is resolved before a court can decide it.

  2. The doctrine that a case becomes moot when the parties to the case settle their dispute before a court can decide it.

  3. The doctrine that a case becomes moot when the law that is being challenged is repealed before a court can decide it.

  4. The doctrine that a case becomes moot when the court lacks jurisdiction to hear it.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The mootness doctrine is the doctrine that a case becomes moot when the issue in the case is resolved before a court can decide it. This doctrine ensures that courts do not decide cases that are no longer relevant.

What is the political question doctrine?

  1. The doctrine that courts should not decide cases that involve political questions.

  2. The doctrine that courts should decide cases that involve political questions.

  3. The doctrine that courts should decide cases that involve legal questions.

  4. The doctrine that courts should decide cases that involve factual questions.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The political question doctrine is the doctrine that courts should not decide cases that involve political questions. This doctrine is based on the separation of powers and ensures that courts do not interfere with the powers of the other branches of government.

What is the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies?

  1. The doctrine that a person must exhaust all administrative remedies before they can file a lawsuit.

  2. The doctrine that a person must exhaust all judicial remedies before they can file a lawsuit.

  3. The doctrine that a person must exhaust all legislative remedies before they can file a lawsuit.

  4. The doctrine that a person must exhaust all executive remedies before they can file a lawsuit.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is the doctrine that a person must exhaust all administrative remedies before they can file a lawsuit. This doctrine ensures that administrative agencies have the opportunity to resolve disputes before they are brought to court.

What is the doctrine of laches?

  1. The doctrine that a person's right to sue may be lost if they delay in filing a lawsuit.

  2. The doctrine that a person's right to sue may be lost if they fail to file a lawsuit within a certain amount of time.

  3. The doctrine that a person's right to sue may be lost if they fail to exhaust all administrative remedies.

  4. The doctrine that a person's right to sue may be lost if they fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The doctrine of laches is the doctrine that a person's right to sue may be lost if they delay in filing a lawsuit. This doctrine is based on the principle that a person should not be allowed to sleep on their rights.

What is the doctrine of estoppel?

  1. The doctrine that a person may be prevented from asserting a claim if they have previously made a statement or taken an action that is inconsistent with the claim.

  2. The doctrine that a person may be prevented from asserting a claim if they have previously been convicted of a crime.

  3. The doctrine that a person may be prevented from asserting a claim if they have previously been found liable in a civil lawsuit.

  4. The doctrine that a person may be prevented from asserting a claim if they have previously settled a dispute.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The doctrine of estoppel is the doctrine that a person may be prevented from asserting a claim if they have previously made a statement or taken an action that is inconsistent with the claim. This doctrine is based on the principle that a person should not be allowed to contradict themselves.

What is the doctrine of res judicata?

  1. The doctrine that a final judgment on the merits of a case bars any further litigation between the same parties on the same cause of action.

  2. The doctrine that a final judgment on the merits of a case bars any further litigation between the same parties on a different cause of action.

  3. The doctrine that a final judgment on the merits of a case bars any further litigation between different parties on the same cause of action.

  4. The doctrine that a final judgment on the merits of a case bars any further litigation between different parties on a different cause of action.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The doctrine of res judicata is the doctrine that a final judgment on the merits of a case bars any further litigation between the same parties on the same cause of action. This doctrine is based on the principle that a person should not be allowed to relitigate the same issue twice.

What is the doctrine of collateral estoppel?

  1. The doctrine that a final judgment on an issue in a case bars any further litigation between the same parties on that issue in a different case.

  2. The doctrine that a final judgment on an issue in a case bars any further litigation between different parties on that issue in a different case.

  3. The doctrine that a final judgment on an issue in a case bars any further litigation between the same parties on that issue in the same case.

  4. The doctrine that a final judgment on an issue in a case bars any further litigation between different parties on that issue in the same case.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The doctrine of collateral estoppel is the doctrine that a final judgment on an issue in a case bars any further litigation between the same parties on that issue in a different case. This doctrine is based on the principle that a person should not be allowed to relitigate the same issue twice.

What is the doctrine of stare decisis?

  1. The doctrine that courts should follow precedent.

  2. The doctrine that courts should not follow precedent.

  3. The doctrine that courts should create new laws.

  4. The doctrine that courts should interpret laws.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The doctrine of stare decisis is the doctrine that courts should follow precedent. This doctrine helps to ensure that the law is consistent and predictable.

- Hide questions