To ensure transparency in campaign spending.

To limit the influence of special interests.

To promote fair and competitive elections.

All of the above.

Contribution limits

Spending limits

Disclosure requirements

Public financing

They restrict the amount of money that individuals or organizations can donate to candidates or political parties.

They encourage candidates to rely more on small donations from a broader base of supporters.

They reduce the influence of wealthy donors and special interest groups.

All of the above.

To ensure transparency and accountability in campaign spending.

To prevent conflicts of interest and corruption.

To inform voters about the sources of campaign funds.

All of the above.

They restrict the amount of money that candidates or political parties can spend on their campaigns.

They encourage candidates to focus on more effective and efficient campaign strategies.

They reduce the influence of outside groups and independent expenditures.

All of the above.

They can promote more competitive elections by reducing the influence of wealthy donors and special interest groups.

They can make elections less competitive by limiting the resources available to candidates.

They have no impact on the competitiveness of elections.

The impact depends on the specific regulations implemented.

They can strengthen the role of political parties by providing them with more resources.

They can weaken the role of political parties by reducing their influence over campaign spending.

They have no impact on the role of political parties.

The impact depends on the specific regulations implemented.

Increased influence of special interests and wealthy donors.

Reduced transparency and accountability in campaign spending.

Greater potential for corruption and conflicts of interest.

All of the above.

They can limit the amount of money candidates can spend on advertising and communication.

They can provide candidates with equal opportunities to communicate with voters.

They have no impact on the ability of candidates to communicate with voters.

The impact depends on the specific regulations implemented.

Increased transparency and accountability in campaign spending.

Reduced influence of special interests and wealthy donors.

Greater public trust in the electoral process.

All of the above.

They can limit the amount of money that candidates can raise from individual donors.

They can provide candidates with access to public financing.

They have no impact on the ability of candidates to raise funds.

The impact depends on the specific regulations implemented.

Lack of resources and capacity among regulatory agencies.

Complex and evolving campaign finance laws.

Political pressure and influence.

All of the above.

They can provide third-party and independent candidates with equal opportunities to compete.

They can make it more difficult for third-party and independent candidates to raise funds and gain visibility.

They have no impact on the ability of third-party and independent candidates to compete.

The impact depends on the specific regulations implemented.

Reduced competition and diversity in elections.

Increased influence of special interests and wealthy donors.

Greater potential for corruption and conflicts of interest.

All of the above.

They can limit the ability of the media to cover elections and candidates.

They can provide the media with more resources and opportunities to cover elections.

They have no impact on the role of the media in elections.

The impact depends on the specific regulations implemented.