This is the most common definition of God among the major religions of the world.

The ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that starts with the idea that God is the greatest conceivable being. It then argues that if God is the greatest conceivable being, then God must exist.

The cosmological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that starts with the idea that the universe is contingent. It then argues that if the universe is contingent, then it must have been caused by something that is not contingent. This something is God.

The teleological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that starts with the idea that the universe is designed for a purpose. It then argues that if the universe is designed for a purpose, then it must have been designed by a designer. This designer is God.

The moral argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that starts with the idea that there are objective moral values. It then argues that if there are objective moral values, then there must be a moral lawgiver. This moral lawgiver is God.

The problem of evil is a philosophical argument against the existence of God. It starts with the idea that if God is all-powerful and all-loving, then he would not allow evil to exist. However, evil does exist, so either God is not all-powerful or he is not all-loving.

The free will defense is a response to the problem of evil that argues that God created humans with free will, and free will allows for the possibility of evil. God does not cause evil, but he allows it to exist because he values human freedom.

The evidential argument from evil is a philosophical argument against the existence of God. It starts with the idea that the existence of evil is evidence against the existence of an all-powerful and all-loving God. If God is all-powerful and all-loving, then he would not allow evil to exist. However, evil does exist, so either God is not all-powerful or he is not all-loving.

The hiddenness of God is the idea that God is hidden from us. There are many reasons why God might be hidden from us, but one possibility is that he is simply too big for us to understand. We are finite creatures, and God is infinite. We cannot fully comprehend something that is infinite.

The problem of divine hiddenness is the problem of why God, if he exists, hides himself from us. There are many possible explanations for why God might hide himself from us, but none of them are fully satisfactory.

The argument from religious experience is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that starts with the idea that religious experiences are evidence for the existence of God. Religious experiences are subjective experiences of the divine, and they can be very powerful and convincing. However, there is no way to prove that religious experiences are caused by God, so the argument from religious experience is not conclusive.

The argument from morality is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that starts with the idea that there are objective moral values. It then argues that if there are objective moral values, then there must be a moral lawgiver. This moral lawgiver is God.

The argument from beauty is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that starts with the idea that the beauty of the universe is evidence for the existence of God. The beauty of the universe is often seen as a sign of God's creativity and power.

The argument from order is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that starts with the idea that the order of the universe is evidence for the existence of God. The order of the universe is often seen as a sign of God's intelligence and design.

The argument from complexity is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that starts with the idea that the complexity of the universe is evidence for the existence of God. The complexity of the universe is often seen as a sign of God's intelligence and design.