Determinism posits that every event, including human choices, is causally determined by preceding events and conditions, denying the existence of true free will.

Compatibilism seeks to reconcile free will and determinism by proposing that an action can be both causally determined and freely chosen if it is performed in accordance with one's desires and intentions.

Libertarianism maintains that true free will requires the absence of prior causes that necessitate a particular action, allowing for genuine spontaneity and indeterminacy in decision-making.

The Argument from Determinism asserts that if our desires and intentions are determined by prior causes, then our actions, which stem from these desires and intentions, cannot be truly free.

Existentialism emphasizes the importance of personal responsibility and moral accountability, regardless of whether or not one's actions are predetermined, asserting that individuals have the freedom to make choices and shape their own existence.

Eternalism posits that all moments in time exist simultaneously, implying that the past, present, and future are equally real and unchangeable, which raises questions about the nature of free will and the significance of choices made in the present.

Determinism maintains that all events, including human actions, are causally determined by prior causes, leaving no room for genuine free will or autonomous decision-making.

The Argument from Ignorance posits that our belief in free will stems from our incomplete knowledge of the causal factors that influence our choices, and that as our understanding of these factors deepens, the illusion of free will will dissipate.

Libertarianism advocates for individual autonomy and the ability to make choices free from external constraints or predetermined factors, asserting that genuine free will requires the absence of causal determinism.

Libertarianism emphasizes the concept of alternative possibilities, asserting that individuals have the freedom to choose between different options, even if those options are constrained by external factors or prior causes.

Compatibilism attempts to bridge the gap between free will and determinism by proposing that an action can be both causally determined and freely chosen if it is performed in accordance with one's desires and intentions.

The Argument from Unconscious Influences asserts that our actions are often driven by unconscious desires, impulses, and biases, which may conflict with our conscious intentions and undermine the idea of rational and autonomous decision-making.

Existentialism emphasizes the importance of personal responsibility and moral accountability, regardless of whether or not one's actions are predetermined or influenced by external factors, asserting that individuals have the freedom to make choices and shape their own existence.

Existentialism emphasizes the concept of transcendence, asserting that individuals have the ability to rise above their predetermined circumstances and make choices that are not dictated by external factors or prior causes, thus exercising their freedom and shaping their own existence.

Determinism maintains that all events, including human actions, are causally determined by prior causes, leaving no room for genuine free will or autonomous decision-making, and asserting that individuals have no genuine control over their choices or the consequences of those choices.