To establish the truth of a belief.

To provide reasons or evidence for a belief.

To guarantee the certainty of a belief.

To ensure the practical utility of a belief.

Deductive argument.

Inductive argument.

Testimony.

Personal experience.

Internal justification refers to the reasons within a belief system, while external justification refers to reasons outside the system.

Internal justification refers to the reasons an individual has for holding a belief, while external justification refers to the reasons others have for accepting the belief.

Internal justification refers to the reasons that are accessible to the believer, while external justification refers to the reasons that are accessible to others.

Internal justification refers to the reasons that are based on evidence, while external justification refers to the reasons that are based on faith.

It claims that all beliefs must be justified by other beliefs, ultimately leading to a foundation of self-evident or indubitable beliefs.

It claims that all beliefs must be justified by evidence, either directly or indirectly.

It claims that all beliefs must be justified by coherence with other beliefs in a belief system.

It claims that all beliefs must be justified by their practical consequences.

It claims that a belief is justified if it is coherent with other beliefs in a belief system.

It claims that a belief is justified if it is supported by evidence.

It claims that a belief is justified if it is based on self-evident or indubitable beliefs.

It claims that a belief is justified if it leads to successful action.

It claims that a belief is justified if it leads to successful action.

It claims that a belief is justified if it is supported by evidence.

It claims that a belief is justified if it is coherent with other beliefs in a belief system.

It claims that a belief is justified if it is based on self-evident or indubitable beliefs.

It argues that all beliefs are ultimately unjustified because they cannot be proven with certainty.

It argues that all beliefs are justified because they are based on evidence.

It argues that all beliefs are justified because they are coherent with other beliefs in a belief system.

It argues that all beliefs are justified because they lead to successful action.

It is a dilemma that arises when trying to justify the foundational beliefs used in foundationalist theories of epistemic justification.

It is a dilemma that arises when trying to justify the coherence of beliefs in coherentist theories of epistemic justification.

It is a dilemma that arises when trying to justify the practical consequences of beliefs in pragmatic theories of epistemic justification.

It is a dilemma that arises when trying to justify the evidence used to support beliefs in empiricist theories of epistemic justification.

It argues that foundationalist theories of epistemic justification lead to an infinite regress of justification.

It argues that foundationalist theories of epistemic justification are circular in their reasoning.

It argues that foundationalist theories of epistemic justification are too narrow and exclude important sources of justification.

It argues that foundationalist theories of epistemic justification are too broad and allow for unjustified beliefs to be considered justified.

It argues that foundationalist theories of epistemic justification are circular in their reasoning.

It argues that foundationalist theories of epistemic justification lead to an infinite regress of justification.

It argues that foundationalist theories of epistemic justification are too narrow and exclude important sources of justification.

It argues that foundationalist theories of epistemic justification are too broad and allow for unjustified beliefs to be considered justified.

It is the problem of justifying the principle of induction, which states that the future will resemble the past.

It is the problem of justifying the principle of deduction, which states that a conclusion follows logically from its premises.

It is the problem of justifying the principle of coherence, which states that beliefs should be consistent with each other.

It is the problem of justifying the principle of pragmatism, which states that beliefs should be justified by their practical consequences.

It is a problem that arises when a belief is justified but not true.

It is a problem that arises when a belief is true but not justified.

It is a problem that arises when a belief is both justified and true.

It is a problem that arises when a belief is neither justified nor true.

It is a paradox that arises when considering the justification of beliefs based on their consequences.

It is a paradox that arises when considering the justification of beliefs based on their coherence with other beliefs.

It is a paradox that arises when considering the justification of beliefs based on their evidence.

It is a paradox that arises when considering the justification of beliefs based on their self-evidence.

It is an argument that claims that knowledge is justified true belief.

It is an argument that claims that knowledge is justified false belief.

It is an argument that claims that knowledge is unjustified true belief.

It is an argument that claims that knowledge is unjustified false belief.