To measure student learning

To provide feedback to students

To inform instructional decisions

To punish students for incorrect answers

Assessment is the process of collecting information about student learning, while evaluation is the process of interpreting that information.

Assessment is the process of making judgments about student learning, while evaluation is the process of collecting information about student learning.

Assessment and evaluation are the same thing.

None of the above.

Formative assessment

Summative assessment

Diagnostic assessment

Achievement test

To measure student learning

To provide feedback to students

To inform instructional decisions

All of the above

Quizzes

Exit tickets

Observations

Homework assignments

To measure student learning

To provide feedback to students

To inform instructional decisions

To all of the above

Final exams

Projects

Portfolios

Observations

To identify students' strengths and weaknesses

To provide feedback to students

To inform instructional decisions

All of the above

Pre-tests

Interviews

Observations

Portfolios

Content validity, construct validity, and predictive validity

Content validity, face validity, and predictive validity

Content validity, construct validity, and concurrent validity

Content validity, face validity, and concurrent validity

Content validity is the extent to which an assessment measures the content that it is supposed to measure, while construct validity is the extent to which an assessment measures the underlying construct that it is supposed to measure.

Content validity is the extent to which an assessment is fair and unbiased, while construct validity is the extent to which an assessment is reliable.

Content validity is the extent to which an assessment is reliable, while construct validity is the extent to which an assessment is fair and unbiased.

None of the above.

Predictive validity is the extent to which an assessment can predict future performance, while concurrent validity is the extent to which an assessment can measure current performance.

Predictive validity is the extent to which an assessment is reliable, while concurrent validity is the extent to which an assessment is fair and unbiased.

Predictive validity is the extent to which an assessment is fair and unbiased, while concurrent validity is the extent to which an assessment is reliable.

None of the above.

Test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and internal consistency

Test-retest reliability, face validity, and predictive validity

Test-retest reliability, content validity, and concurrent validity

Test-retest reliability, face validity, and concurrent validity

Test-retest reliability is the extent to which an assessment yields consistent results when administered to the same students on two different occasions, while inter-rater reliability is the extent to which two or more raters agree on the scores they assign to the same assessment.

Test-retest reliability is the extent to which an assessment is reliable, while inter-rater reliability is the extent to which an assessment is fair and unbiased.

Test-retest reliability is the extent to which an assessment is fair and unbiased, while inter-rater reliability is the extent to which an assessment is reliable.

None of the above.

Internal consistency is the extent to which the items on an assessment measure the same construct, while face validity is the extent to which an assessment appears to measure what it is supposed to measure.

Internal consistency is the extent to which an assessment is reliable, while face validity is the extent to which an assessment is fair and unbiased.

Internal consistency is the extent to which an assessment is fair and unbiased, while face validity is the extent to which an assessment is reliable.

None of the above.