Anthropocentrism is the ethical theory that humans are the center of moral concern and that the environment and animals have value only insofar as they serve human interests.

Biocentrism is the ethical theory that all living things have inherent value and that humans have a moral obligation to respect and protect them.

Ecocentrism is the ethical theory that the environment as a whole has inherent value and that humans have a moral obligation to protect and preserve it.

The land ethic is the ethical theory that humans have a moral obligation to protect and preserve the land and its resources for future generations.

All of the above are arguments for animal rights. Animals are sentient beings capable of suffering, they have a right to life, and they have a right to liberty.

All of the above are arguments against animal rights. Animals are not rational beings, they do not have a concept of morality, and they are not capable of making moral choices.

The value of a forest for its timber is an anthropocentric value because it is based on the human use of the forest.

The value of a forest for its biodiversity is a biocentric value because it is based on the inherent value of the forest's living organisms.

The value of the Earth as a whole is an ecocentric value because it is based on the inherent value of the Earth's ecosystems.

The value of the land for future generations is a land ethic value because it is based on the idea that we have a moral obligation to protect and preserve the land for future generations.

All of the above are common criticisms of anthropocentrism. Anthropocentrism is too narrow in its focus on human interests, it does not take into account the interests of animals, and it does not take into account the interests of the environment.

Biocentrism is too broad in its focus on all living things. It does not take into account the interests of humans or the interests of the environment.

Ecocentrism is too narrow in its focus on the environment. It does not take into account the interests of humans or the interests of animals.

The land ethic is too narrow in its focus on future generations. It does not take into account the interests of present generations or the interests of the environment.

All of the above are common arguments for animal rights. Animals are sentient beings capable of suffering, they have a right to life, and they have a right to liberty.