Nationality jurisdiction allows a state to exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed outside its territory if the accused is a national of that state.

Protective jurisdiction allows a state to exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed outside its territory if the crime is committed against its nationals or interests.

Universal jurisdiction allows a state to exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed outside its territory if the crime is considered a crime against humanity, war crime, or genocide.

The International Criminal Court has jurisdiction to prosecute individuals accused of committing crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide.

The principle of relevance, the principle of reliability, and the principle of fairness all govern the admissibility of evidence in international criminal trials.

Hearsay is not a ground for excluding evidence in an international criminal trial.

The prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt in international criminal trials.

The right to remain silent is not a right of the accused in an international criminal trial.

The principle of proportionality, the principle of deterrence, and the principle of retribution all govern the sentencing of individuals convicted of crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide.

The accused's prior criminal record is not a factor that courts consider when sentencing individuals convicted of crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide.

The principle of cooperation governs the enforcement of sentences imposed by the International Criminal Court.

Using military force to apprehend the accused is not a method of enforcing sentences imposed by the International Criminal Court.

The principle of judicial independence, the principle of transparency, and the principle of accountability all govern the review of decisions of the International Criminal Court.

An error of law, an error of fact, and a miscarriage of justice are all grounds for appealing a decision of the International Criminal Court.

The principle of textualism, the principle of purposivism, and the principle of effectiveness all govern the interpretation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.