The main premise of the Argument from Divine Justice is that there must be a just God who will reward the good and punish the evil. This premise is based on the idea that justice is a fundamental moral principle that must be upheld.

The conclusion of the Argument from Divine Justice is that God exists. This conclusion is based on the premise that there must be a just God who will reward the good and punish the evil. If there is no such God, then there is no justice in the universe, which is a contradiction.

One objection to the Argument from Divine Justice is the problem of evil. This problem asks why, if there is a just God, does evil exist in the world? If God is all-powerful and all-loving, then why does he allow innocent people to suffer? This is a difficult question to answer, and it has led some people to reject the Argument from Divine Justice.

One response to the problem of evil is that humans have free will. This means that we are free to choose between good and evil. If we choose to do evil, then we cannot blame God for the consequences of our actions. This response is consistent with the Argument from Divine Justice, which does not claim that God is responsible for evil in the world.

The problem of free will is that it seems to conflict with the attributes of God. If God is all-knowing, then he knows what choices we will make. If he is all-powerful, then he can prevent us from making bad choices. If he is all-loving, then he would not want us to suffer the consequences of our bad choices. However, if we have free will, then we are free to choose between good and evil, even if God knows what we will choose and even if he could prevent us from making bad choices.

One response to the problem of free will is that free will is an illusion. This means that we do not actually have the freedom to choose between good and evil. Instead, our choices are determined by our genes, our environment, and our past experiences. This response is consistent with the Argument from Divine Justice, which does not require that humans have free will.

The problem of hiddenness is that God is hidden from us. We cannot see him, we cannot hear him, and we cannot touch him. This makes it difficult for us to believe in him. The Argument from Divine Justice does not address the problem of hiddenness, but it does provide some evidence for the existence of God.

One response to the problem of hiddenness is that God reveals himself to us through nature and through our conscience. Nature is full of beauty and wonder, and it points to the existence of a creator. Our conscience tells us what is right and wrong, and it points to the existence of a moral lawgiver. These are just two ways that God reveals himself to us, even though we cannot see him or hear him.

The problem of suffering is that there is so much suffering in the world. Innocent people suffer from natural disasters, diseases, and violence. Children suffer from abuse and neglect. Animals suffer from pain and death. The problem of suffering is a challenge to the Argument from Divine Justice, because it seems to contradict the idea that there is a just God who loves us.

One response to the problem of suffering is that it is a mystery that we cannot understand. This response is consistent with the Argument from Divine Justice, which does not claim to explain why there is suffering in the world. However, this response does not provide much comfort to those who are suffering.

The main argument against the Argument from Divine Justice is the problem of evil. This problem asks why, if there is a just God, does evil exist in the world? If God is all-powerful and all-loving, then why does he allow innocent people to suffer? This is a difficult question to answer, and it has led some people to reject the Argument from Divine Justice.

One response to the argument against the Argument from Divine Justice is that humans have free will. This means that we are free to choose between good and evil. If we choose to do evil, then we cannot blame God for the consequences of our actions. This response is consistent with the Argument from Divine Justice, which does not claim that God is responsible for evil in the world.

The main conclusion of the Argument from Divine Justice is that God exists. This conclusion is based on the premise that there must be a just God who will reward the good and punish the evil. If there is no such God, then there is no justice in the universe, which is a contradiction.

One objection to the main conclusion of the Argument from Divine Justice is the problem of evil. This problem asks why, if there is a just God, does evil exist in the world? If God is all-powerful and all-loving, then why does he allow innocent people to suffer? This is a difficult question to answer, and it has led some people to reject the main conclusion of the Argument from Divine Justice.

One response to the objection to the main conclusion of the Argument from Divine Justice is that humans have free will. This means that we are free to choose between good and evil. If we choose to do evil, then we cannot blame God for the consequences of our actions. This response is consistent with the Argument from Divine Justice, which does not claim that God is responsible for evil in the world.