Minor terms are not required to be substantially performed in order for a party to be considered to have substantially performed the contract.

Breach of contract by the other party is not an excuse for nonperformance. Instead, it is a ground for rescission or damages.

Constructive conditions are not a type of condition. They are a legal doctrine that allows a party to terminate a contract if the other party has substantially breached the contract.

Injunction is not a remedy for breach of contract. It is a remedy for a threatened or ongoing breach of contract.

The hardship to the defendant is not a factor that a court will consider in determining whether to award specific performance.

Restitution damages are not a type of damages that can be awarded for breach of contract. They are a remedy that seeks to restore the parties to the position they were in before the contract was entered into.

Unconscionability is not a defense to a claim for breach of contract. It is a ground for rescission or reformation of the contract.

Actual anticipatory breach is not a type of anticipatory breach of contract. It is a breach of contract that occurs when a party actually fails to perform the contract.

Specific performance is not a remedy for anticipatory breach of contract. It is a remedy for actual breach of contract.

The hardship to the defendant is not a factor that a court will consider in determining whether to award an injunction.

Implied contract is not a type of quasi-contract. It is a type of contract that is created by the law, rather than by the express agreement of the parties.

Unconscionability is not a defense to a claim for restitution. It is a ground for rescission or reformation of the contract.

Benefit conferred under a mistake of law is not a type of unjust enrichment.

Unjust enrichment is not a remedy for unjust enrichment. It is the name of the cause of action.

The hardship to the defendant is not a factor that a court will consider in determining the amount of restitution to award.