Back
0

The Relationship Between Law and Morality

Description: This quiz is designed to test your understanding of the relationship between law and morality. You will be presented with questions about the different theories of legal positivism and natural law, as well as the arguments for and against each theory.
Number of Questions: 14
Created by:
Tags: philosophy of law legal positivism natural law
Start the Quiz
Attempted 0/14 Correct 0 Score 0
‹
›

Which of the following is a key principle of legal positivism?

  1. Laws are created by human beings.

  2. Laws are based on moral principles.

  3. Laws are derived from natural law.

  4. Laws are always just.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Legal positivism is the theory that laws are created by human beings, and that they are not necessarily based on moral principles.

Who is considered the father of legal positivism?

  1. John Austin

  2. H.L.A. Hart

  3. Jeremy Bentham

  4. Ronald Dworkin

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

John Austin is considered the father of legal positivism. He argued that laws are created by human beings, and that they are not necessarily based on moral principles.

What is the difference between legal positivism and natural law?

  1. Legal positivism is based on human reason, while natural law is based on divine revelation.

  2. Legal positivism is based on the idea that laws are created by human beings, while natural law is based on the idea that laws are derived from nature.

  3. Legal positivism is based on the idea that laws are always just, while natural law is based on the idea that laws can be unjust.

  4. Legal positivism is based on the idea that laws are always effective, while natural law is based on the idea that laws can be ineffective.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The main difference between legal positivism and natural law is that legal positivism is based on the idea that laws are created by human beings, while natural law is based on the idea that laws are derived from nature.

What is the argument from authority for legal positivism?

  1. Laws are created by human beings who have the authority to create laws.

  2. Laws are based on moral principles that are universally accepted.

  3. Laws are derived from natural law that is discoverable by human reason.

  4. Laws are always just and effective.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The argument from authority for legal positivism is that laws are created by human beings who have the authority to create laws. This authority can be derived from a variety of sources, such as a constitution, a legislature, or a court.

What is the argument from consent for legal positivism?

  1. Laws are created by human beings who have the authority to create laws.

  2. Laws are based on moral principles that are universally accepted.

  3. Laws are derived from natural law that is discoverable by human reason.

  4. Laws are always just and effective because they are consented to by the people who are subject to them.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The argument from consent for legal positivism is that laws are always just and effective because they are consented to by the people who are subject to them. This consent can be express or implied.

What is the argument from utility for legal positivism?

  1. Laws are created by human beings who have the authority to create laws.

  2. Laws are based on moral principles that are universally accepted.

  3. Laws are derived from natural law that is discoverable by human reason.

  4. Laws are always just and effective because they promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The argument from utility for legal positivism is that laws are always just and effective because they promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. This principle is also known as the utilitarian principle.

What is the argument from justice for natural law?

  1. Laws are created by human beings who have the authority to create laws.

  2. Laws are based on moral principles that are universally accepted.

  3. Laws are derived from natural law that is discoverable by human reason.

  4. Laws are always just and effective because they are consented to by the people who are subject to them.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The argument from justice for natural law is that laws are based on moral principles that are universally accepted. These moral principles are discoverable by human reason, and they provide the foundation for just laws.

What is the argument from nature for natural law?

  1. Laws are created by human beings who have the authority to create laws.

  2. Laws are based on moral principles that are universally accepted.

  3. Laws are derived from natural law that is discoverable by human reason.

  4. Laws are always just and effective because they are consented to by the people who are subject to them.

Show answer
Correct Option: C
Explanation:

The argument from nature for natural law is that laws are derived from natural law that is discoverable by human reason. This natural law is based on the order and harmony of the universe, and it provides the foundation for just laws.

What is the argument from religion for natural law?

  1. Laws are created by human beings who have the authority to create laws.

  2. Laws are based on moral principles that are universally accepted.

  3. Laws are derived from natural law that is discoverable by human reason.

  4. Laws are based on religious principles that are revealed by God.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The argument from religion for natural law is that laws are based on religious principles that are revealed by God. These religious principles provide the foundation for just laws.

Which of the following is a criticism of legal positivism?

  1. Legal positivism is too abstract and does not take into account the real-world consequences of laws.

  2. Legal positivism is too focused on the letter of the law and does not take into account the spirit of the law.

  3. Legal positivism is too rigid and does not allow for flexibility in the application of laws.

  4. All of the above.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Legal positivism has been criticized for being too abstract, too focused on the letter of the law, and too rigid. Critics argue that legal positivism does not take into account the real-world consequences of laws, the spirit of the law, or the need for flexibility in the application of laws.

Which of the following is a criticism of natural law?

  1. Natural law is too vague and does not provide clear guidance for how to resolve legal disputes.

  2. Natural law is too subjective and depends on the individual's own moral beliefs.

  3. Natural law is too idealistic and does not take into account the realities of politics and power.

  4. All of the above.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Natural law has been criticized for being too vague, too subjective, and too idealistic. Critics argue that natural law does not provide clear guidance for how to resolve legal disputes, that it depends on the individual's own moral beliefs, and that it does not take into account the realities of politics and power.

Which of the following is an example of a legal positivist theory?

  1. The theory of John Austin

  2. The theory of H.L.A. Hart

  3. The theory of Jeremy Bentham

  4. All of the above.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

John Austin, H.L.A. Hart, and Jeremy Bentham are all legal positivists. Their theories share the common belief that laws are created by human beings, and that they are not necessarily based on moral principles.

Which of the following is an example of a natural law theory?

  1. The theory of Thomas Aquinas

  2. The theory of John Locke

  3. The theory of Immanuel Kant

  4. All of the above.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Thomas Aquinas, John Locke, and Immanuel Kant are all natural law theorists. Their theories share the common belief that laws are derived from natural law, which is based on moral principles that are discoverable by human reason.

Which of the following is a contemporary debate in the philosophy of law?

  1. The debate between legal positivism and natural law

  2. The debate between originalism and living constitutionalism

  3. The debate between consequentialism and deontology

  4. All of the above.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The debate between legal positivism and natural law, the debate between originalism and living constitutionalism, and the debate between consequentialism and deontology are all contemporary debates in the philosophy of law.

- Hide questions
ADVERTISEMENT

Find more quizzes from top tags

general knowledge
3615 Quizzes
119858 Questions
 technology
307 Quizzes
36705 Questions
 sports
963 Quizzes
19148 Questions
 history
1187 Quizzes
13475 Questions
 physics
598 Quizzes
13441 Questions
 biology
1160 Quizzes
12174 Questions
 science & technology
551 Quizzes
11015 Questions
 chemistry
490 Quizzes
9892 Questions
 maths
518 Quizzes
9324 Questions
 softskills
0 Quizzes
7131 Questions