Injunctions

Damages

Profits

Restitution

Actual damages

Lost profits

Willful infringement

All of the above

To prevent future infringement

To compensate the plaintiff for damages

To punish the infringer

To transfer ownership of the trademark to the plaintiff

Actual damages are based on the plaintiff's actual losses, while lost profits are based on the profits the plaintiff would have made but for the infringement.

Actual damages are based on the defendant's profits, while lost profits are based on the plaintiff's losses.

Actual damages are based on the value of the trademark, while lost profits are based on the profits the plaintiff would have made but for the infringement.

Actual damages are based on the plaintiff's expenses, while lost profits are based on the profits the plaintiff would have made but for the infringement.

To prevent future infringement

To compensate the plaintiff for damages

To punish the infringer

To transfer ownership of the trademark to the plaintiff

An injunction is a court order, while a cease-and-desist letter is a request.

An injunction is issued by a court, while a cease-and-desist letter is issued by an attorney.

An injunction is enforceable by law, while a cease-and-desist letter is not.

All of the above

To prevent irreparable harm to the plaintiff

To compensate the plaintiff for damages

To punish the infringer

To transfer ownership of the trademark to the plaintiff

A permanent injunction is issued after a trial, while a preliminary injunction is issued before a trial.

A permanent injunction is issued by a court, while a preliminary injunction is issued by an administrative agency.

A permanent injunction is enforceable by law, while a preliminary injunction is not.

All of the above

To settle the case without a trial

To compensate the plaintiff for damages

To punish the infringer

To transfer ownership of the trademark to the plaintiff

A trademark infringement lawsuit is filed in federal court, while a trademark opposition proceeding is filed with the USPTO.

A trademark infringement lawsuit is filed by the trademark owner, while a trademark opposition proceeding is filed by a third party.

A trademark infringement lawsuit can result in damages, while a trademark opposition proceeding can result in the cancellation of the trademark.

All of the above

To prevent the tarnishment of a trademark

To prevent the blurring of a trademark

To prevent the loss of distinctiveness of a trademark

All of the above

A trademark infringement claim is based on the use of a mark that is confusingly similar to the plaintiff's mark, while a trademark dilution claim is based on the use of a mark that is not confusingly similar to the plaintiff's mark.

A trademark infringement claim is based on the use of a mark in commerce, while a trademark dilution claim is based on the use of a mark outside of commerce.

A trademark infringement claim can result in damages, while a trademark dilution claim can result in an injunction.

All of the above

To cancel a trademark registration

To prevent the registration of a trademark

To transfer ownership of a trademark

All of the above

A trademark opposition proceeding is filed before a trademark is registered, while a trademark cancellation proceeding is filed after a trademark is registered.

A trademark opposition proceeding is filed by a third party, while a trademark cancellation proceeding is filed by the trademark owner.

A trademark opposition proceeding can result in the cancellation of a trademark registration, while a trademark cancellation proceeding can result in the transfer of ownership of a trademark.

All of the above