Charles Tilly is widely regarded as the father of the New Historical Sociology, a school of thought that emphasizes the importance of historical context in understanding social phenomena.

The New Historical Sociology argues that social phenomena can only be fully understood by examining their historical roots and the social, political, and economic forces that have shaped them.

The New Historical Sociology typically relies on qualitative methods, such as archival research and case studies, rather than quantitative methods, which are more common in other sociological approaches.

Conjunctures are moments in history when multiple historical forces intersect and interact, leading to significant social and political changes.

While the New Historical Sociology addresses various aspects of social change, it is primarily focused on political and economic processes, rather than cultural change.

Skocpol argues that revolutions occur when a state is unable to effectively manage economic and political crises, leading to a breakdown of social order and the emergence of revolutionary movements.

Mann argues that power is a multidimensional phenomenon that is rooted in the control of economic, political, and military resources.

While Anderson's work addresses various historical themes, the concept of Oriental despotism is not central to his analysis of social change.

Critics argue that the New Historical Sociology's focus on historical context can lead to a neglect of other factors, such as social structure and agency, in explaining social phenomena.

The New Historical Sociology has provided valuable insights into the historical roots and processes of state formation, social movements, economic development, and other important social phenomena.