To provide legal aid to the poor and marginalized.

To promote social justice and public welfare.

To safeguard the rights of individuals and groups.

All of the above.

Lack of resources and funding.

Limited access to legal aid for the poor.

Unwillingness of courts to entertain PIL cases.

Misuse of PIL for personal or political gains.

The doctrine of locus standi requires that a person must have a direct and personal interest in a matter before they can file a PIL.

The doctrine of locus standi has been relaxed in PIL cases, allowing individuals and groups to file PILs on behalf of the public interest.

The doctrine of locus standi is not applicable to PIL cases.

None of the above.

The Supreme Court of India has played a crucial role in promoting PIL and expanding its scope.

The Supreme Court of India has been reluctant to entertain PIL cases, fearing that it would lead to judicial overreach.

The Supreme Court of India has no role in PIL.

None of the above.

PIL can be used for personal or political gains, rather than for the public interest.

PIL can lead to judicial overreach and interference in the functioning of other branches of government.

PIL can be time-consuming and expensive, making it inaccessible to the poor and marginalized.

All of the above.

Increasing the number of PIL courts and judges.

Providing legal aid and financial assistance to PIL petitioners.

Encouraging the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.

Restricting the scope of PIL to only the most serious and urgent matters.

PIL has helped to raise awareness about important social issues and bring about positive changes in society.

PIL has provided a platform for the poor and marginalized to seek justice and enforce their rights.

PIL has contributed to the development of progressive jurisprudence and the expansion of constitutional rights.

All of the above.

By imposing strict penalties on individuals and organizations that file frivolous or vexatious PILs.

By requiring PIL petitioners to disclose their sources of funding and any potential conflicts of interest.

By establishing a mechanism for screening PIL petitions before they are admitted by the courts.

All of the above.

PIL can lead to judicial overreach and interference in the functioning of the executive and legislative branches.

PIL can promote accountability and transparency in government decision-making.

PIL can contribute to better coordination and collaboration between different branches of government.

All of the above.

By providing legal aid and financial assistance to PIL petitioners.

By streamlining the PIL litigation process and reducing unnecessary delays.

By encouraging the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.

All of the above.

The media can play a crucial role in raising awareness about PIL and important social issues.

The media can help to scrutinize the functioning of the PIL system and hold PIL petitioners accountable.

The media can contribute to the development of public opinion and influence the outcome of PIL cases.

All of the above.

By increasing the number of PIL courts and judges.

By providing legal aid and financial assistance to PIL petitioners.

By encouraging the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.

By promoting public awareness and education about PIL.

The Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation case, which led to the recognition of the right to shelter.

The MC Mehta vs. Union of India case, which resulted in the closure of polluting industries and the cleanup of the Ganga River.

The Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan case, which established guidelines for preventing sexual harassment at the workplace.

All of the above.

PIL has led to the recognition of new constitutional rights, such as the right to a clean environment and the right to information.

PIL has helped to enforce existing constitutional rights and ensure their effective implementation.

PIL has contributed to the development of progressive jurisprudence and the interpretation of constitutional provisions in a manner that promotes social justice.

All of the above.