To determine the original intent of the law's drafters.

To promote justice and fairness in the application of the law.

To ensure that the law is applied consistently and predictably.

To identify and resolve ambiguities in the law.

Textualism

Originalism

Purposivism

Formalism

Textualism focuses on the plain meaning of the law, while originalism focuses on the intent of the law's drafters.

Textualism focuses on the purpose of the law, while originalism focuses on the plain meaning of the law.

Textualism focuses on the historical context of the law, while originalism focuses on the plain meaning of the law.

Textualism focuses on the consequences of the law, while originalism focuses on the plain meaning of the law.

Precedent is binding on lower courts, but not on higher courts.

Precedent is persuasive, but not binding on any court.

Precedent is binding on all courts, regardless of their level.

Precedent is irrelevant to legal hermeneutics.

A statutory interpretation is made by a legislature, while a judicial interpretation is made by a court.

A statutory interpretation is made by a court, while a judicial interpretation is made by a legislature.

A statutory interpretation is made by a government agency, while a judicial interpretation is made by a court.

A statutory interpretation is made by a court, while a judicial interpretation is made by a government agency.

To provide definitions of legal terms.

To provide examples of how legal terms are used in context.

To provide citations to legal cases and statutes.

All of the above.

A legal maxim is a general statement of law, while a legal principle is a specific rule of law.

A legal maxim is a specific rule of law, while a legal principle is a general statement of law.

A legal maxim is a statement of law that is binding on courts, while a legal principle is a statement of law that is not binding on courts.

A legal maxim is a statement of law that is not binding on courts, while a legal principle is a statement of law that is binding on courts.

Context is irrelevant to legal hermeneutics.

Context is important for understanding the meaning of legal texts.

Context is important for understanding the purpose of legal texts.

All of the above.

A literal interpretation focuses on the plain meaning of the law, while a purposive interpretation focuses on the purpose of the law.

A literal interpretation focuses on the purpose of the law, while a purposive interpretation focuses on the plain meaning of the law.

A literal interpretation focuses on the historical context of the law, while a purposive interpretation focuses on the plain meaning of the law.

A literal interpretation focuses on the consequences of the law, while a purposive interpretation focuses on the plain meaning of the law.

A mandatory rule must be followed, while a directory rule may be disregarded.

A mandatory rule may be disregarded, while a directory rule must be followed.

A mandatory rule is a rule that is binding on courts, while a directory rule is a rule that is not binding on courts.

A mandatory rule is a rule that is not binding on courts, while a directory rule is a rule that is binding on courts.

A civil law system is based on a code of laws, while a common law system is based on case law.

A civil law system is based on case law, while a common law system is based on a code of laws.

A civil law system is based on a constitution, while a common law system is based on a code of laws.

A civil law system is based on a code of laws, while a common law system is based on a constitution.

A statute is a law passed by a legislature, while a regulation is a law passed by an administrative agency.

A statute is a law passed by an administrative agency, while a regulation is a law passed by a legislature.

A statute is a law that is binding on all citizens, while a regulation is a law that is only binding on certain groups of people.

A statute is a law that is only binding on certain groups of people, while a regulation is a law that is binding on all citizens.

A criminal case is a case in which the government is prosecuting an individual for a crime, while a civil case is a case in which one individual is suing another individual for damages.

A criminal case is a case in which one individual is suing another individual for damages, while a civil case is a case in which the government is prosecuting an individual for a crime.

A criminal case is a case in which the government is suing an individual for damages, while a civil case is a case in which one individual is suing another individual for a crime.

A criminal case is a case in which one individual is suing another individual for a crime, while a civil case is a case in which the government is suing an individual for damages.

A plaintiff is the person who is suing another person, while a defendant is the person who is being sued.

A plaintiff is the person who is being sued, while a defendant is the person who is suing another person.

A plaintiff is the person who is representing the government in a criminal case, while a defendant is the person who is being prosecuted by the government in a criminal case.

A plaintiff is the person who is being prosecuted by the government in a criminal case, while a defendant is the person who is representing the government in a criminal case.