Moral absolutism is the ethical theory that certain actions are morally right or wrong regardless of the circumstances or consequences.

Moral absolutists believe that moral values are based on the inherent nature of human beings and that these values are discoverable through reason.

Moral absolutism and moral relativism are two opposing ethical theories. Moral absolutism holds that moral values are objective and unchanging, while moral relativism holds that moral values are subjective and relative.

Moral absolutists believe that certain actions are always wrong, regardless of the circumstances or consequences. Lying is one example of an action that moral absolutists believe is always wrong.

Moral relativists believe that moral values are subjective and relative to the culture or society in which they are held. What is right or wrong in one culture may be wrong or indifferent in another culture.

Moral absolutism has been criticized for being too rigid and inflexible, impractical and unrealistic, and intolerant of other viewpoints.

Moral relativism has been criticized for being too subjective and arbitrary, leading to moral chaos and anarchy, and undermining the possibility of objective moral truth.

Whether or not moral absolutism is compatible with democracy depends on the specific form of democracy and the specific form of moral absolutism. Some forms of moral absolutism may be compatible with some forms of democracy, while other forms of moral absolutism may be incompatible with any form of democracy.

Whether or not moral relativism is compatible with human rights depends on the specific form of moral relativism and the specific form of human rights. Some forms of moral relativism may be compatible with some forms of human rights, while other forms of moral relativism may be incompatible with any form of human rights.

Whether or not moral absolutism can be used to justify violence depends on the specific form of moral absolutism and the specific circumstances. Some forms of moral absolutism may be used to justify violence in some circumstances, while other forms of moral absolutism may never be used to justify violence.

Whether or not moral relativism can be used to justify cultural practices that are harmful to women depends on the specific form of moral relativism and the specific cultural practices. Some forms of moral relativism may be used to justify cultural practices that are harmful to women, while other forms of moral relativism may never be used to justify such practices.

Whether or not moral absolutism is a viable ethical theory depends on the specific form of moral absolutism and the specific circumstances. Some forms of moral absolutism may be viable ethical theories, while other forms of moral absolutism may not be viable ethical theories.

Whether or not moral relativism is a viable ethical theory depends on the specific form of moral relativism and the specific circumstances. Some forms of moral relativism may be viable ethical theories, while other forms of moral relativism may not be viable ethical theories.

There is no one ethical theory that is better than all other ethical theories. The best ethical theory for a particular situation will depend on the specific circumstances of that situation.