A country is considered safe if it provides adequate protection to refugees.

A country is considered safe if it has a high standard of living.

A country is considered safe if it has a strong military.

A country is considered safe if it is a member of the United Nations.

The country's human rights record.

The country's political stability.

The country's economic situation.

All of the above.

It can lead to refugees being returned to countries where they are not safe.

It can be used to deter refugees from seeking asylum.

It can undermine the principle of non-refoulement.

All of the above.

Albania.

Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Kosovo.

All of the above.

A safe third country is a country where a refugee can be returned to, while a country of first asylum is a country where a refugee first arrives.

A safe third country is a country that has signed the Refugee Convention, while a country of first asylum is a country that has not signed the Refugee Convention.

A safe third country is a country that has a good human rights record, while a country of first asylum is a country that does not have a good human rights record.

None of the above.

The principle that a refugee should not be returned to a country where they would face persecution.

The principle that a refugee should be given the right to work in the country where they have sought asylum.

The principle that a refugee should be given the right to vote in the country where they have sought asylum.

None of the above.

The difficulty of determining which countries are safe.

The reluctance of some countries to accept refugees.

The lack of resources to support refugees in safe third countries.

All of the above.

It is likely to become more widely used.

It is likely to become less widely used.

It is likely to remain the same.

It is impossible to say.

To determine which countries are safe third countries.

To provide assistance to refugees in safe third countries.

To monitor the human rights situation in safe third countries.

All of the above.

The concept of safe third countries is a way of sharing the burden of refugee protection.

The concept of safe third countries is a way of avoiding the burden of refugee protection.

There is no relationship between the concept of safe third countries and the principle of burden-sharing.

None of the above.

The concept of safe third countries violates the principle of non-refoulement.

The concept of safe third countries violates the principle of burden-sharing.

The concept of safe third countries violates the principle of equality.

All of the above.

A safe third country is a country where a refugee can be returned to, while a country of origin is a country where a refugee comes from.

A safe third country is a country that has signed the Refugee Convention, while a country of origin is a country that has not signed the Refugee Convention.

A safe third country is a country that has a good human rights record, while a country of origin is a country that does not have a good human rights record.

None of the above.

The concept of safe third countries can lead to refugees being returned to countries where they are not safe.

The concept of safe third countries can be used to deter refugees from seeking asylum.

The concept of safe third countries can undermine the principle of non-refoulement.

All of the above.

To determine which countries are safe third countries.

To provide assistance to refugees in safe third countries.

To monitor the human rights situation in safe third countries.

To rule on cases involving the return of refugees to safe third countries.