Negligence

Assault

Battery

Trespass to chattels

Assault is an intentional act that causes harmful or offensive contact, while battery is an intentional act that causes the reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact.

Assault is an intentional act that causes the reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact, while battery is an intentional act that causes harmful or offensive contact.

Assault is an intentional act that causes harmful or offensive contact, while battery is an intentional act that causes the reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact.

Assault is an intentional act that causes the reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact, while battery is an intentional act that causes harmful or offensive contact.

Intent, harmful or offensive contact, and causation

Intent, reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact, and causation

Intent, harmful or offensive contact, and damages

Intent, reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact, and damages

False imprisonment is the intentional confinement of a person without lawful authority, while malicious prosecution is the malicious initiation of a criminal prosecution against a person.

False imprisonment is the malicious initiation of a criminal prosecution against a person, while malicious prosecution is the intentional confinement of a person without lawful authority.

False imprisonment is the intentional confinement of a person without lawful authority, while malicious prosecution is the malicious initiation of a civil lawsuit against a person.

False imprisonment is the malicious initiation of a civil lawsuit against a person, while malicious prosecution is the intentional confinement of a person without lawful authority.

Intent, confinement, and causation

Intent, reasonable apprehension of confinement, and causation

Intent, confinement, and damages

Intent, reasonable apprehension of confinement, and damages

Trespass to chattels is the intentional interference with the possession of personal property, while conversion is the intentional exercise of dominion over personal property.

Trespass to chattels is the intentional exercise of dominion over personal property, while conversion is the intentional interference with the possession of personal property.

Trespass to chattels is the intentional interference with the possession of personal property, while conversion is the intentional deprivation of personal property.

Trespass to chattels is the intentional deprivation of personal property, while conversion is the intentional interference with the possession of personal property.

Intent, interference with possession, and damages

Intent, reasonable apprehension of interference with possession, and damages

Intent, interference with possession, and causation

Intent, reasonable apprehension of interference with possession, and causation

Defamation is the publication of a false statement that injures a person's reputation, while slander is the publication of a false statement that injures a person's reputation in the form of spoken words.

Defamation is the publication of a false statement that injures a person's reputation in the form of spoken words, while slander is the publication of a false statement that injures a person's reputation.

Defamation is the publication of a false statement that injures a person's reputation, while slander is the publication of a false statement that injures a person's reputation in the form of written words.

Defamation is the publication of a false statement that injures a person's reputation in the form of written words, while slander is the publication of a false statement that injures a person's reputation.

Publication, falsity, and damages

Publication, falsity, and intent

Publication, falsity, and special damages

Publication, falsity, and general damages

Fraud is the intentional misrepresentation of a material fact that induces another person to act to their detriment, while misrepresentation is the unintentional misrepresentation of a material fact that induces another person to act to their detriment.

Fraud is the unintentional misrepresentation of a material fact that induces another person to act to their detriment, while misrepresentation is the intentional misrepresentation of a material fact that induces another person to act to their detriment.

Fraud is the intentional misrepresentation of a material fact that induces another person to act to their benefit, while misrepresentation is the unintentional misrepresentation of a material fact that induces another person to act to their benefit.

Fraud is the unintentional misrepresentation of a material fact that induces another person to act to their benefit, while misrepresentation is the intentional misrepresentation of a material fact that induces another person to act to their benefit.

Intent, misrepresentation of a material fact, reliance, and damages

Intent, misrepresentation of a material fact, justifiable reliance, and damages

Intent, misrepresentation of a material fact, reliance, and special damages

Intent, misrepresentation of a material fact, justifiable reliance, and special damages

Negligence is the breach of a legal duty that causes harm to another person, while intentional torts are civil wrongs that are committed intentionally.

Negligence is the breach of a legal duty that causes harm to another person, while intentional torts are civil wrongs that are committed unintentionally.

Negligence is the breach of a legal duty that causes harm to another person, while intentional torts are criminal wrongs that are committed intentionally.

Negligence is the breach of a legal duty that causes harm to another person, while intentional torts are criminal wrongs that are committed unintentionally.

Assault, battery, and false imprisonment

Trespass to chattels, conversion, and defamation

Fraud, misrepresentation, and negligence

Assault, battery, and negligence

Intentional torts require the defendant to have intended to cause harm, while strict liability torts do not.

Intentional torts require the defendant to have intended to cause harm, while strict liability torts require the defendant to have been negligent.

Intentional torts require the defendant to have intended to cause harm, while strict liability torts require the defendant to have been reckless.

Intentional torts require the defendant to have intended to cause harm, while strict liability torts require the defendant to have been intentional.

Consent, self-defense, and necessity

Consent, self-defense, and privilege

Consent, self-defense, and justification

Consent, self-defense, and immunity