To provide legal aid to the poor and marginalized.

To safeguard the fundamental rights of citizens.

To promote social justice and equality.

All of the above.

Only individuals who have been directly affected by a violation of their rights.

Only non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

Any person or group of persons acting in the public interest.

Only government agencies.

Cases involving violations of fundamental rights.

Cases involving environmental issues.

Cases involving consumer rights.

All of the above.

To adjudicate PIL cases and provide remedies.

To monitor the implementation of PIL orders.

To raise awareness about PIL and encourage its use.

All of the above.

Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)

MC Mehta vs. Union of India (1985)

Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan (1997)

All of the above.

By ensuring the equal enjoyment of fundamental rights by minorities.

By addressing discrimination and prejudice against minorities.

By promoting the cultural and linguistic rights of minorities.

All of the above.

Lack of awareness about PIL among minority communities.

Limited access to legal aid and resources for minority groups.

Resistance from dominant groups and vested interests.

All of the above.

Raising awareness about PIL among minority communities.

Providing legal aid and resources to minority groups.

Encouraging collaboration between NGOs and minority organizations.

All of the above.

It provides a platform for marginalized communities to seek justice.

It holds government and public authorities accountable for their actions.

It contributes to the development of progressive jurisprudence.

All of the above.

By challenging discriminatory laws and policies.

By seeking remedies for victims of discrimination.

By raising awareness about the issue of discrimination.

All of the above.

It can be time-consuming and expensive.

It may not always lead to immediate or effective remedies.

It may face resistance from powerful interests.

All of the above.

By increasing awareness about PIL among minority communities.

By providing legal aid and support to minority groups.

By strengthening the capacity of courts to handle PIL cases.

All of the above.

They can provide legal aid and support to minority groups.

They can raise awareness about PIL and minority rights issues.

They can monitor the implementation of PIL orders.

All of the above.

By challenging laws and policies that discriminate against minority languages and cultures.

By seeking remedies for violations of cultural and linguistic rights.

By raising awareness about the importance of cultural and linguistic diversity.

All of the above.

The case of the National Commission for Minorities vs. Union of India (2017).

The case of Tehseen Poonawalla vs. Union of India (2018).

The case of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind vs. Union of India (2019).

All of the above.