To facilitate a settlement between disputing parties

To determine the liability of the parties involved

To impose a binding decision on the parties

To gather evidence for a subsequent trial

Cargo damage claims

Charter party disputes

Marine insurance disputes

All of the above

It is a cost-effective process.

It is a confidential process.

It is a faster process compared to litigation.

All of the above

A judge or arbitrator

A maritime lawyer

A neutral third party with expertise in maritime law

A representative from the shipping company involved in the dispute

To act as a judge and decide the outcome of the dispute

To represent one of the parties involved in the dispute

To facilitate communication and negotiation between the parties

To gather evidence and prepare a report for a subsequent trial

A binding settlement agreement

A non-binding agreement that the parties can choose to follow

A decision by the mediator that is binding on the parties

A recommendation for further litigation

The parties may have different cultural backgrounds and communication styles.

The parties may have strong emotional attachments to their positions.

The legal and regulatory framework governing maritime disputes can be complex.

All of the above

Strong communication and negotiation skills

Expertise in maritime law and regulations

Cultural sensitivity and an understanding of different business practices

All of the above

Yes, it is mandatory in all maritime disputes.

No, it is not mandatory, but it is often recommended.

It depends on the jurisdiction and the specific dispute.

It depends on the size of the claim.

The willingness of the parties to negotiate in good faith

The skill and experience of the mediator

The complexity of the dispute

All of the above