A benevolent God would not create a world in which suffering exists.

The existence of suffering is evidence against the existence of God.

The existence of suffering is evidence for the existence of God.

A benevolent God would create a world in which suffering exists.

A benevolent God would not create a world in which suffering exists.

The existence of suffering is evidence against the existence of God.

The existence of suffering is evidence for the existence of God.

A benevolent God would create a world in which suffering exists.

The problem of evil is the problem of how to reconcile the existence of evil with the existence of a benevolent God.

The problem of evil is the problem of how to reconcile the existence of evil with the existence of an all-powerful God.

The problem of evil is the problem of how to reconcile the existence of evil with the existence of a just God.

The problem of evil is the problem of how to reconcile the existence of evil with the existence of a loving God.

The free will defense to the problem of evil is the argument that God created humans with free will, and that humans are responsible for the evil that exists in the world.

The free will defense to the problem of evil is the argument that God created humans without free will, and that God is responsible for the evil that exists in the world.

The free will defense to the problem of evil is the argument that God created humans with free will, and that God is responsible for the evil that exists in the world.

The free will defense to the problem of evil is the argument that God created humans without free will, and that humans are responsible for the evil that exists in the world.

The evidential argument from evil is the argument that the existence of evil is evidence against the existence of God.

The evidential argument from evil is the argument that the existence of evil is evidence for the existence of God.

The evidential argument from evil is the argument that the existence of evil is evidence against the existence of a benevolent God.

The evidential argument from evil is the argument that the existence of evil is evidence for the existence of a benevolent God.

The logical problem of evil is the argument that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of a benevolent God.

The logical problem of evil is the argument that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of an all-powerful God.

The logical problem of evil is the argument that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of a just God.

The logical problem of evil is the argument that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of a loving God.

The soul-making theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to give souls the opportunity to grow and develop.

The soul-making theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to give souls the opportunity to experience suffering.

The soul-making theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to give souls the opportunity to learn from their mistakes.

The soul-making theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to give souls the opportunity to experience joy.

The Irenaean theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to allow creatures to experience the full range of their potential.

The Irenaean theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to allow creatures to experience the full range of their suffering.

The Irenaean theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to allow creatures to learn from their mistakes.

The Irenaean theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to allow creatures to experience joy.

The Augustinian theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to punish creatures for their sins.

The Augustinian theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to allow creatures to experience the full range of their potential.

The Augustinian theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to allow creatures to learn from their mistakes.

The Augustinian theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to allow creatures to experience joy.

The Thomistic theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to allow creatures to experience the full range of their potential.

The Thomistic theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to allow creatures to experience the full range of their suffering.

The Thomistic theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to allow creatures to learn from their mistakes.

The Thomistic theodicy is the argument that God created the world in order to allow creatures to experience joy.

The Leibnizian theodicy is the argument that God created the best possible world.

The Leibnizian theodicy is the argument that God created the worst possible world.

The Leibnizian theodicy is the argument that God created the only possible world.

The Leibnizian theodicy is the argument that God created a world that is neither good nor bad.

The Humean theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a mystery that cannot be explained.

The Humean theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God does not exist.

The Humean theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God is not benevolent.

The Humean theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God is not all-powerful.

The Kantian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a necessary condition for the existence of moral good.

The Kantian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God does not exist.

The Kantian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God is not benevolent.

The Kantian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God is not all-powerful.

The Schellingian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a necessary condition for the existence of freedom.

The Schellingian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God does not exist.

The Schellingian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God is not benevolent.

The Schellingian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God is not all-powerful.

The Hegelian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a necessary condition for the existence of progress.

The Hegelian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God does not exist.

The Hegelian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God is not benevolent.

The Hegelian theodicy is the argument that the existence of evil is a sign that God is not all-powerful.