Tuition and fees are paid by students and families, not by state or local governments.

State and local governments provide approximately 25-30% of total revenue for higher education institutions.

California has the highest level of state funding for higher education per student, at over \$15,000 per year.

Mississippi has the lowest level of state funding for higher education per student, at less than \$5,000 per year.

The primary purpose of state and local funding for higher education is to cover the cost of instruction, including faculty salaries, classroom materials, and other instructional expenses.

State and local funding for higher education has fluctuated over time, depending on the economic climate and political priorities.

Decreased state and local funding for higher education can lead to increased tuition and fees, reduced access to higher education, and lower quality of education.

State and local governments face a number of challenges in providing funding for higher education, including rising costs of higher education, competing budget priorities, and economic downturns.

There are a number of potential solutions to the challenges facing state and local governments in providing funding for higher education, including increasing state and local taxes, cutting costs at higher education institutions, and increasing federal funding for higher education.

Local property taxes are a minor source of funding for higher education, accounting for less than 5% of total revenue.

Local property taxes lead to less equitable funding for higher education because they are based on the value of property, which can vary widely from one community to another.

There are a number of arguments in favor of using local property taxes to fund higher education, including the fact that they are a reliable source of revenue, they allow local communities to have a say in how their tax dollars are spent, and they help to ensure that higher education is accessible to all students.

There are a number of arguments against using local property taxes to fund higher education, including the fact that they are regressive, they lead to less equitable funding for higher education, and they discourage economic development.

There are a number of alternatives to using local property taxes to fund higher education, including increasing state and local income taxes, increasing state and local sales taxes, and increasing tuition and fees.