Science and philosophy share characteristics like systematic inquiry, reliance on evidence, and openness to new ideas. However, subjectivity is generally not considered a common trait between the two disciplines.

Falsifiability is a key concept in science, referring to the ability to disprove a hypothesis through empirical evidence.

Rationalism, associated with philosophers like Descartes and Leibniz, emphasizes the power of reason and logical argumentation in acquiring knowledge.

Science primarily aims to understand the fundamental principles and laws that govern the natural world.

Plato's theory of forms posits that there exists a realm of perfect and eternal forms or ideas, which are the true essence of things.

Tentativeness acknowledges that scientific theories are provisional and subject to change based on new evidence and insights.

Empiricism, associated with philosophers like Locke and Hume, emphasizes the role of experience and sensory perception in gaining knowledge.

Inductive reasoning involves forming general principles or hypotheses based on specific observations and evidence.

All of the options correctly highlight key differences between science and philosophy.

Descartes' famous statement 'cogito ergo sum' expresses the idea that the act of thinking provides indubitable evidence of one's own existence.

Relativism acknowledges that scientific knowledge is shaped by the specific cultural, historical, and social contexts in which it is developed.

Intuition, while important in certain contexts, is generally not considered a primary method of scientific inquiry.

Kant's categorical imperative is a moral principle that emphasizes acting in a way that could be universalized as a law for all rational beings.

Tentativeness acknowledges that scientific theories are provisional and subject to change based on new evidence and insights.

All of the options correctly highlight key differences between science and philosophy.