It has made political art more exclusive and elitist.

It has democratized access to political art, making it available to a broader audience.

It has had no significant impact on the accessibility of political art.

It has led to the decline of traditional forms of political art.

Increased visibility and reach.

Opportunities for collaboration and networking.

Enhanced interactivity and engagement.

Potential for censorship and suppression.

It has made political art more passive and detached.

It has facilitated more active engagement and participation.

It has had no significant impact on the way political art is consumed and experienced.

It has led to the demise of traditional forms of art consumption.

Banksy's street art shared on Instagram.

Ai Weiwei's social media activism.

The #BlackLivesMatter movement's use of social media.

All of the above.

It has created a barrier between artists and audiences.

It has fostered a more direct and personal connection between artists and audiences.

It has had no significant impact on the relationship between artists and audiences.

It has led to the decline of traditional forms of artist-audience interaction.

Navigating censorship and suppression.

Dealing with online harassment and abuse.

Adapting to the fast-paced and ever-changing nature of social media.

Maintaining artistic integrity while catering to a mass audience.

It has diminished the impact of political art in social movements.

It has enhanced the visibility and reach of political art in social movements.

It has had no significant impact on the role of political art in social movements.

It has led to the decline of traditional forms of political art in social movements.

The removal of Banksy's artwork from Instagram.

The suspension of Ai Weiwei's Twitter account.

The blocking of #BlackLivesMatter content on Facebook.

All of the above.

It has made political art more ephemeral and difficult to preserve.

It has facilitated the archiving and preservation of political art.

It has had no significant impact on the archiving and preservation of political art.

It has led to the decline of traditional forms of art archiving and preservation.

It has enabled artists to collaborate and share ideas more easily.

It has provided artists with new tools and techniques for creating art.

It has made the creation of political art more expensive and time-consuming.

It has facilitated the dissemination of political art to a wider audience.

It has made the evaluation and critique of political art more subjective and personal.

It has facilitated more informed and nuanced evaluations of political art.

It has had no significant impact on the evaluation and critique of political art.

It has led to the decline of traditional forms of art evaluation and critique.

The marginalization of traditional forms of political art.

The homogenization of political art due to the dominance of certain platforms and algorithms.

The erosion of artistic autonomy and independence.

The democratization of political art and the emergence of new voices.

It has made it more difficult for political artists to secure funding and support.

It has provided new opportunities for political artists to generate income and sustain their work.

It has had no significant impact on the funding and sustainability of political art.

It has led to the decline of traditional forms of art funding and sustainability.

It has enabled artists to bypass traditional gatekeepers and institutions.

It has facilitated the spread of political art across borders and cultures.

It has made political art more susceptible to manipulation and distortion.

It has led to the decline of traditional forms of art dissemination.

It has made political art more ephemeral and less impactful.

It has extended the reach and impact of political art beyond its initial context.

It has had no significant impact on the impact and legacy of political art.

It has led to the decline of traditional forms of art impact and legacy.