The Problem of Evil

Description: The Problem of Evil is a philosophical argument that challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It asks why, if such a God exists, there is evil in the world.
Number of Questions: 15
Created by:
Tags: philosophy ethics religion
Attempted 0/15 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the Problem of Evil?

  1. The argument that the existence of evil disproves the existence of God.

  2. The argument that the existence of evil is compatible with the existence of God.

  3. The argument that the existence of evil is a mystery that cannot be explained.

  4. The argument that the existence of evil is a proof of the existence of God.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The Problem of Evil is a philosophical argument that challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It asks why, if such a God exists, there is evil in the world.

What are the three main types of evil?

  1. Moral evil, natural evil, and metaphysical evil.

  2. Physical evil, mental evil, and spiritual evil.

  3. Good evil, bad evil, and neutral evil.

  4. Objective evil, subjective evil, and relative evil.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Moral evil is evil that is caused by human beings, such as murder, theft, and rape. Natural evil is evil that is caused by nature, such as earthquakes, floods, and diseases. Metaphysical evil is evil that is inherent in the universe, such as the existence of pain and suffering.

What is the argument from evil?

  1. The argument that the existence of evil disproves the existence of God.

  2. The argument that the existence of evil is compatible with the existence of God.

  3. The argument that the existence of evil is a mystery that cannot be explained.

  4. The argument that the existence of evil is a proof of the existence of God.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The argument from evil is a philosophical argument that challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It asks why, if such a God exists, there is evil in the world.

What is the free will defense?

  1. The argument that God created humans with free will, and that free will is the cause of evil.

  2. The argument that God created humans without free will, and that evil is therefore not the fault of humans.

  3. The argument that God created humans with free will, but that God also has the power to prevent evil from happening.

  4. The argument that God created humans without free will, but that God also has the power to prevent evil from happening.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The free will defense is a response to the argument from evil. It argues that God created humans with free will, and that free will is the cause of evil. According to this defense, God cannot prevent evil from happening without violating human free will.

What is the problem of hell?

  1. The argument that the existence of hell is incompatible with the existence of a benevolent God.

  2. The argument that the existence of hell is compatible with the existence of a benevolent God.

  3. The argument that the existence of hell is a mystery that cannot be explained.

  4. The argument that the existence of hell is a proof of the existence of a benevolent God.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The problem of hell is a philosophical argument that challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It asks why, if such a God exists, there is a place of eternal punishment like hell.

What is the soul-making theodicy?

  1. The argument that God created humans in order for them to learn and grow through experience, even if that experience includes suffering.

  2. The argument that God created humans in order for them to worship Him.

  3. The argument that God created humans in order for them to enjoy life.

  4. The argument that God created humans in order for them to suffer.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The soul-making theodicy is a response to the problem of evil. It argues that God created humans in order for them to learn and grow through experience, even if that experience includes suffering. According to this theodicy, suffering is a necessary part of human growth and development.

What is the hiddenness of God?

  1. The argument that God is hidden from humans.

  2. The argument that God is not hidden from humans.

  3. The argument that God is both hidden and not hidden from humans.

  4. The argument that God is neither hidden nor not hidden from humans.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The hiddenness of God is a philosophical argument that challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It asks why, if such a God exists, He is hidden from humans.

What is the argument from divine hiddenness?

  1. The argument that the hiddenness of God disproves the existence of God.

  2. The argument that the hiddenness of God is compatible with the existence of God.

  3. The argument that the hiddenness of God is a mystery that cannot be explained.

  4. The argument that the hiddenness of God is a proof of the existence of God.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The argument from divine hiddenness is a philosophical argument that challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It asks why, if such a God exists, He is hidden from humans.

What is the argument from religious diversity?

  1. The argument that the existence of religious diversity disproves the existence of God.

  2. The argument that the existence of religious diversity is compatible with the existence of God.

  3. The argument that the existence of religious diversity is a mystery that cannot be explained.

  4. The argument that the existence of religious diversity is a proof of the existence of God.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The argument from religious diversity is a philosophical argument that challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It asks why, if such a God exists, there are so many different religions in the world.

What is the argument from theodicy?

  1. The argument that God is not responsible for evil.

  2. The argument that God is responsible for evil.

  3. The argument that God is both responsible and not responsible for evil.

  4. The argument that God is neither responsible nor not responsible for evil.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The argument from theodicy is a philosophical argument that attempts to reconcile the existence of evil with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It argues that God is not responsible for evil.

What is the argument from theodicy?

  1. The argument that God is not responsible for evil.

  2. The argument that God is responsible for evil.

  3. The argument that God is both responsible and not responsible for evil.

  4. The argument that God is neither responsible nor not responsible for evil.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The argument from theodicy is a philosophical argument that attempts to reconcile the existence of evil with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It argues that God is not responsible for evil.

What is the argument from theodicy?

  1. The argument that God is not responsible for evil.

  2. The argument that God is responsible for evil.

  3. The argument that God is both responsible and not responsible for evil.

  4. The argument that God is neither responsible nor not responsible for evil.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The argument from theodicy is a philosophical argument that attempts to reconcile the existence of evil with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It argues that God is not responsible for evil.

What is the argument from theodicy?

  1. The argument that God is not responsible for evil.

  2. The argument that God is responsible for evil.

  3. The argument that God is both responsible and not responsible for evil.

  4. The argument that God is neither responsible nor not responsible for evil.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The argument from theodicy is a philosophical argument that attempts to reconcile the existence of evil with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It argues that God is not responsible for evil.

What is the argument from theodicy?

  1. The argument that God is not responsible for evil.

  2. The argument that God is responsible for evil.

  3. The argument that God is both responsible and not responsible for evil.

  4. The argument that God is neither responsible nor not responsible for evil.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The argument from theodicy is a philosophical argument that attempts to reconcile the existence of evil with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It argues that God is not responsible for evil.

What is the argument from theodicy?

  1. The argument that God is not responsible for evil.

  2. The argument that God is responsible for evil.

  3. The argument that God is both responsible and not responsible for evil.

  4. The argument that God is neither responsible nor not responsible for evil.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The argument from theodicy is a philosophical argument that attempts to reconcile the existence of evil with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It argues that God is not responsible for evil.

- Hide questions