To provide remedies for breach of contract.

To enforce specific performance of contracts.

To grant injunctions to prevent irreparable injury.

To award damages for breach of contract.

When the subject matter of the contract is unique.

When the contract is for the sale of land.

When the contract is for the sale of goods.

When the contract is for the provision of services.

An injunction prevents a party from doing something, while specific performance compels a party to do something.

An injunction is a temporary remedy, while specific performance is a permanent remedy.

An injunction is granted to protect a legal right, while specific performance is granted to enforce a contractual obligation.

All of the above.

To prevent irreparable injury.

To prevent a breach of contract.

To protect a legal right.

All of the above.

A mandatory injunction compels a party to do something, while a prohibitory injunction prevents a party from doing something.

A mandatory injunction is a temporary remedy, while a prohibitory injunction is a permanent remedy.

A mandatory injunction is granted to protect a legal right, while a prohibitory injunction is granted to enforce a contractual obligation.

None of the above.

The doctrine of laches prevents a party from seeking relief if they have delayed in doing so.

The doctrine of laches is a defense to a claim for specific performance.

The doctrine of laches is a defense to a claim for an injunction.

All of the above.

The doctrine of acquiescence prevents a party from seeking relief if they have consented to the breach of contract.

The doctrine of acquiescence is a defense to a claim for specific performance.

The doctrine of acquiescence is a defense to a claim for an injunction.

All of the above.

The doctrine of estoppel prevents a party from denying the truth of a statement they have previously made.

The doctrine of estoppel is a defense to a claim for specific performance.

The doctrine of estoppel is a defense to a claim for an injunction.

All of the above.

The doctrine of frustration of contract excuses a party from performing their contractual obligations if an unforeseen event makes performance impossible or impracticable.

The doctrine of frustration of contract is a defense to a claim for specific performance.

The doctrine of frustration of contract is a defense to a claim for an injunction.

All of the above.

The doctrine of mistake allows a party to avoid a contract if they entered into it under a mistake of fact.

The doctrine of mistake is a defense to a claim for specific performance.

The doctrine of mistake is a defense to a claim for an injunction.

All of the above.

The doctrine of undue influence allows a party to avoid a contract if they were pressured into entering into it by another party.

The doctrine of undue influence is a defense to a claim for specific performance.

The doctrine of undue influence is a defense to a claim for an injunction.

All of the above.

The doctrine of duress allows a party to avoid a contract if they were forced into entering into it by another party.

The doctrine of duress is a defense to a claim for specific performance.

The doctrine of duress is a defense to a claim for an injunction.

All of the above.

The doctrine of unconscionability allows a court to refuse to enforce a contract if it is found to be unfair or oppressive.

The doctrine of unconscionability is a defense to a claim for specific performance.

The doctrine of unconscionability is a defense to a claim for an injunction.

All of the above.

The doctrine of illegality prevents a court from enforcing a contract that is illegal or contrary to public policy.

The doctrine of illegality is a defense to a claim for specific performance.

The doctrine of illegality is a defense to a claim for an injunction.

All of the above.

The doctrine of impossibility excuses a party from performing their contractual obligations if performance is impossible or impracticable.

The doctrine of impossibility is a defense to a claim for specific performance.

The doctrine of impossibility is a defense to a claim for an injunction.

All of the above.