The Nash bargaining solution is the solution that maximizes the product of the players' payoffs. This is because the product of the players' payoffs is a measure of the total value that is created by the agreement.

All of the above statements are true. In a cooperative game, the players can communicate with each other, they have a common goal, and they can make binding agreements. In a non-cooperative game, the players cannot communicate with each other, they have different goals, and they cannot make binding agreements.

All of the above statements are true. The mediator's role is to help the players reach an agreement, to ensure that the agreement is fair to both players, and to enforce the agreement.

In a distributive game, the players are competing for a fixed amount of resources, while in an integrative game, they are working together to create value. In a distributive game, the players have different goals, while in an integrative game, they have a common goal. In a distributive game, the players cannot make binding agreements, while in an integrative game, they can.

All of the above statements are true. Power gives one player an advantage over the other player. Power can be used to coerce the other player into accepting an agreement. Power can be used to influence the other player's preferences.

All of the above statements are true. A threat is a statement that one player will do something harmful to the other player if the other player does not accept the agreement. A promise is a statement that one player will do something beneficial to the other player if the other player accepts the agreement. A threat is more likely to be effective than a promise.

All of the above statements are true. Information can give one player an advantage over the other player. Information can be used to influence the other player's preferences. Information can be used to make more accurate predictions about the other player's behavior.

A concession is a statement that one player is willing to give up something in order to reach an agreement. A compromise is a statement that both players are willing to give up something in order to reach an agreement. A compromise is more likely to be effective than a concession.

All of the above statements are true. Time can give one player an advantage over the other player. Time can be used to influence the other player's preferences. Time can be used to make more accurate predictions about the other player's behavior.

A BATNA is a statement that one player will do if the other player does not accept the agreement. A WATNA is a statement that one player will do if the other player accepts the agreement. A BATNA is more likely to be effective than a WATNA.

All of the above statements are true. Emotions can give one player an advantage over the other player. Emotions can be used to influence the other player's preferences. Emotions can be used to make more accurate predictions about the other player's behavior.

In a negotiation, the parties are trying to reach an agreement on their own, while in a mediation, a third party is helping them to reach an agreement. In a negotiation, the parties are trying to reach an agreement that is beneficial to both parties, while in a mediation, the third party is trying to reach an agreement that is fair to both parties. In a negotiation, the parties are trying to reach an agreement that is efficient, while in a mediation, the third party is trying to reach an agreement that is equitable.

All of the above statements are true. Culture can give one player an advantage over the other player. Culture can be used to influence the other player's preferences. Culture can be used to make more accurate predictions about the other player's behavior.

In a win-win negotiation, both parties benefit from the agreement, while in a win-lose negotiation, one party benefits from the agreement and the other party loses. In a win-win negotiation, the parties are trying to reach an agreement that is efficient, while in a win-lose negotiation, the parties are trying to reach an agreement that is beneficial to one party and harmful to the other party. In a win-win negotiation, the parties are trying to reach an agreement that is fair to both parties, while in a win-lose negotiation, the parties are trying to reach an agreement that is unfair to one party and beneficial to the other party.