The angle at which an object is viewed is the primary factor that influences our perception of its size. This is because the size of the object's retinal image is directly proportional to the angle at which it is viewed.

The Ebbinghaus illusion is a classic example of how context can influence size perception. In this illusion, a central circle is surrounded by a ring of smaller circles. The central circle appears larger than it actually is because it is surrounded by the smaller circles.

Size constancy is the tendency to perceive objects that are closer to us as being larger than objects that are farther away, even though their retinal images are the same size. This is because our brains take into account the distance between the object and the observer when estimating its size.

All of the above factors can affect our perception of the size of an object. For example, an object that is brightly lit or has a light color may appear larger than an object that is dimly lit or has a dark color. Similarly, an object with a rough texture may appear larger than an object with a smooth texture.

The vertical size illusion is the tendency to perceive objects that are higher in our visual field as being larger than objects that are lower in our visual field. This is because our brains tend to overestimate the size of objects that are farther away from us.

Relative size is a monocular size cue that refers to the comparison of the size of an object to the size of other objects in the same visual scene. For example, if we see a person standing next to a tree, we can estimate the size of the person by comparing their height to the height of the tree.

Binocular disparity is a binocular size cue that refers to the difference in the position of an object in the left and right eyes. This difference is caused by the fact that our eyes are separated by a horizontal distance, which means that they see objects from slightly different angles. The brain uses this difference in perspective to calculate the distance to the object and its size.

The looming effect is the tendency to perceive objects that are moving towards us as being larger than objects that are moving away from us. This is because the retinal image of an object that is moving towards us is getting larger, while the retinal image of an object that is moving away from us is getting smaller.

All of the above are examples of cognitive size cues. Cognitive size cues are based on our past experiences, cultural expectations, and stereotypes. For example, we may expect a basketball to be larger than a tennis ball, even if they are the same size.

The familiarity size illusion is the tendency to perceive objects that are more familiar to us as being larger than objects that are less familiar. This is because our brains have a tendency to associate familiar objects with larger sizes.

All of the above are examples of size constancy errors. Size constancy errors occur when we perceive an object as being the same size even though its retinal image is changing. This is because our brains take into account the distance between the object and the observer when estimating its size.

The surround size illusion is the tendency to perceive objects that are surrounded by smaller objects as being larger than objects that are surrounded by larger objects. This is because our brains tend to compare the size of an object to the size of the objects that are around it.

All of the above are examples of size-weight illusions. Size-weight illusions occur when we perceive an object as being larger than it actually is because it is heavy, dense, or solid.

The upright-inverted size illusion is the tendency to perceive objects that are presented in an upright orientation as being larger than objects that are presented in an inverted orientation. This is because our brains have a tendency to associate upright objects with larger sizes.

A railroad track that appears to converge in the distance is an example of a Ponzo illusion. The Ponzo illusion is a classic example of how our brains can be fooled by linear perspective. In this illusion, the converging lines of the railroad track create the illusion that the tracks are getting closer together in the distance, which makes the objects at the end of the tracks appear to be larger than they actually are.