- Ethics of Determinism
- Ethics of Determinism - Quizzes
- The Problem of Evil and Determinism
The Problem of Evil and Determinism
| Description: The Problem of Evil and Determinism Quiz | |
| Number of Questions: 14 | |
| Created by: Aliensbrain Bot | |
| Tags: philosophy philosophy of determinism the problem of evil determinism |
What is the problem of evil?
-
The problem of evil is the problem of reconciling the existence of evil with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God.
-
The problem of evil is the problem of reconciling the existence of evil with the existence of a malevolent and omnipotent God.
-
The problem of evil is the problem of reconciling the existence of evil with the existence of a benevolent and impotent God.
-
The problem of evil is the problem of reconciling the existence of evil with the existence of a malevolent and impotent God.
The problem of evil is a philosophical argument that challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. The argument states that if God is benevolent, then he would not allow evil to exist. If God is omnipotent, then he could prevent evil from existing. Therefore, either God is not benevolent or he is not omnipotent.
What is the free will defense to the problem of evil?
-
The free will defense states that God allows evil to exist because he wants to give humans the freedom to choose between good and evil.
-
The free will defense states that God allows evil to exist because he wants to test humans and see if they will choose to follow him.
-
The free will defense states that God allows evil to exist because he wants to punish humans for their sins.
-
The free will defense states that God allows evil to exist because he wants to show humans the consequences of their actions.
The free will defense is a response to the problem of evil that states that God allows evil to exist because he wants to give humans the freedom to choose between good and evil. If God did not allow evil to exist, then humans would not have the freedom to choose between good and evil. Therefore, God allows evil to exist in order to give humans the freedom to choose.
What is the evidential argument from evil?
-
The evidential argument from evil states that the existence of evil is evidence that God does not exist.
-
The evidential argument from evil states that the existence of evil is evidence that God is not benevolent.
-
The evidential argument from evil states that the existence of evil is evidence that God is not omnipotent.
-
The evidential argument from evil states that the existence of evil is evidence that God is not just.
The evidential argument from evil is a philosophical argument that states that the existence of evil is evidence that God does not exist. The argument states that if God existed, then he would not allow evil to exist. Therefore, the existence of evil is evidence that God does not exist.
What is the logical problem of evil?
-
The logical problem of evil states that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God.
-
The logical problem of evil states that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of a malevolent and omnipotent God.
-
The logical problem of evil states that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of a benevolent and impotent God.
-
The logical problem of evil states that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of a malevolent and impotent God.
The logical problem of evil is a philosophical argument that states that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. The argument states that if God is benevolent, then he would not allow evil to exist. If God is omnipotent, then he could prevent evil from existing. Therefore, either God is not benevolent or he is not omnipotent.
What is the soul-making theodicy?
-
The soul-making theodicy states that God allows evil to exist in order to help humans develop their souls.
-
The soul-making theodicy states that God allows evil to exist in order to test humans and see if they will choose to follow him.
-
The soul-making theodicy states that God allows evil to exist in order to punish humans for their sins.
-
The soul-making theodicy states that God allows evil to exist in order to show humans the consequences of their actions.
The soul-making theodicy is a response to the problem of evil that states that God allows evil to exist in order to help humans develop their souls. The argument states that humans need to experience evil in order to grow and develop. Therefore, God allows evil to exist in order to help humans develop their souls.
What is the greater good defense?
-
The greater good defense states that God allows evil to exist because it is necessary for a greater good.
-
The greater good defense states that God allows evil to exist because it is necessary for a lesser evil.
-
The greater good defense states that God allows evil to exist because it is necessary for a neutral good.
-
The greater good defense states that God allows evil to exist because it is necessary for a lesser good.
The greater good defense is a response to the problem of evil that states that God allows evil to exist because it is necessary for a greater good. The argument states that some evils are necessary in order to achieve a greater good. Therefore, God allows evil to exist in order to achieve a greater good.
What is the mystery of evil?
-
The mystery of evil is the idea that the existence of evil is a mystery that cannot be solved.
-
The mystery of evil is the idea that the existence of evil is a mystery that can be solved.
-
The mystery of evil is the idea that the existence of evil is a mystery that should not be solved.
-
The mystery of evil is the idea that the existence of evil is a mystery that should be solved.
The mystery of evil is the idea that the existence of evil is a mystery that cannot be solved. The argument states that the existence of evil is a mystery that is beyond human understanding. Therefore, we cannot solve the mystery of evil.
What is the problem of determinism?
-
The problem of determinism is the problem of reconciling the existence of determinism with the existence of human freedom.
-
The problem of determinism is the problem of reconciling the existence of determinism with the existence of divine freedom.
-
The problem of determinism is the problem of reconciling the existence of determinism with the existence of moral responsibility.
-
The problem of determinism is the problem of reconciling the existence of determinism with the existence of free will.
The problem of determinism is a philosophical argument that challenges the compatibility of determinism and human freedom. The argument states that if determinism is true, then our actions are determined by factors beyond our control. Therefore, we do not have free will.
What is the compatibilist response to the problem of determinism?
-
The compatibilist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are compatible.
-
The compatibilist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are incompatible.
-
The compatibilist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is true and human freedom is false.
-
The compatibilist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is false and human freedom is true.
The compatibilist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are compatible. The argument states that determinism does not necessarily entail the absence of free will. Therefore, it is possible for determinism to be true and for humans to have free will.
What is the incompatibilist response to the problem of determinism?
-
The incompatibilist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are incompatible.
-
The incompatibilist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are compatible.
-
The incompatibilist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is true and human freedom is false.
-
The incompatibilist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is false and human freedom is true.
The incompatibilist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are incompatible. The argument states that if determinism is true, then our actions are determined by factors beyond our control. Therefore, we do not have free will.
What is the libertarian response to the problem of determinism?
-
The libertarian response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is false and human freedom is true.
-
The libertarian response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is true and human freedom is false.
-
The libertarian response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are compatible.
-
The libertarian response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are incompatible.
The libertarian response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is false and human freedom is true. The argument states that we have free will because our actions are not determined by factors beyond our control. Therefore, we are free to choose our own actions.
What is the hard determinist response to the problem of determinism?
-
The hard determinist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is true and human freedom is false.
-
The hard determinist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is false and human freedom is true.
-
The hard determinist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are compatible.
-
The hard determinist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are incompatible.
The hard determinist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is true and human freedom is false. The argument states that if determinism is true, then our actions are determined by factors beyond our control. Therefore, we do not have free will.
What is the soft determinist response to the problem of determinism?
-
The soft determinist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are compatible.
-
The soft determinist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is true and human freedom is false.
-
The soft determinist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism is false and human freedom is true.
-
The soft determinist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are incompatible.
The soft determinist response to the problem of determinism states that determinism and human freedom are compatible. The argument states that determinism does not necessarily entail the absence of free will. Therefore, it is possible for determinism to be true and for humans to have free will.
What is the middle knowledge response to the problem of determinism?
-
The middle knowledge response to the problem of determinism states that God has middle knowledge of what humans would do in different circumstances.
-
The middle knowledge response to the problem of determinism states that God has no knowledge of what humans would do in different circumstances.
-
The middle knowledge response to the problem of determinism states that God has complete knowledge of what humans would do in different circumstances.
-
The middle knowledge response to the problem of determinism states that God has limited knowledge of what humans would do in different circumstances.
The middle knowledge response to the problem of determinism states that God has middle knowledge of what humans would do in different circumstances. The argument states that God knows what humans would do in different circumstances, but he does not determine what they will do. Therefore, humans have free will.