To limit the president's power to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of Congress.

To give the president the authority to declare war.

To establish a system for the peaceful resolution of international disputes.

To provide for the defense of the United States against attack.

The president must notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action.

The president must obtain the consent of Congress within 60 days of committing armed forces to military action.

The president may not commit armed forces to military action for more than 90 days without the consent of Congress.

All of the above.

It prevents the president from unilaterally committing the United States to war.

It ensures that Congress has a say in decisions about war and peace.

It promotes transparency and accountability in the use of military force.

All of the above.

It is unconstitutional because it infringes on the president's power as commander-in-chief.

It is ineffective because the president can simply ignore it.

It is outdated and does not reflect the modern realities of warfare.

All of the above.

Yes, it has been successful in preventing the president from unilaterally committing the United States to war.

No, it has not been successful because the president can simply ignore it.

It is too early to say whether the War Powers Resolution has been successful.

None of the above.