Litigation is a process of resolving disputes through the courts, while ADR methods are alternative to litigation.

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is the primary legislation governing ADR in India, including the enforcement of ADR awards.

Mistake of fact is not a ground for setting aside an ADR award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an ADR award is enforceable in India as a decree of a civil court.

Seizing the property of the party against whom the award is made is not a method of enforcing an ADR award in India.

The time limit for filing a suit for enforcement of an ADR award in India is 3 years from the date of the award.

Delay in filing the suit for enforcement is not a challenge to the enforcement of an ADR award in India.

The Supreme Court of India has held that ADR awards are binding on the parties even if they are erroneous, unless they are set aside by a court.

The cost of the ADR process is not a factor that courts consider when determining whether to enforce an ADR award.

The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2019 did not increase the scope of judicial review of ADR awards.

Enhanced certainty and predictability is not a benefit of enforcing ADR awards.

The enforcement of ADR awards in India is governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Ambiguity or unintelligibility of the award is not a ground for refusing to enforce an ADR award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The time limit for challenging an ADR award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is 90 days from the date of the award.

Seizing the property of the party against whom the award is made is not a method of enforcing an ADR award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.