The term 'Kama' primarily means 'desire' in Indian philosophy.

The Bhagavad Gita states that Kama is a source of suffering because it leads to attachment and dissatisfaction.

The desire for liberation is not considered a legitimate form of Kama because it is not a worldly desire.

Kama and Dharma are complementary to each other because Kama provides the motivation for action, while Dharma provides the ethical framework for action.

Indulgence is not a strategy for overcoming Kama because it only strengthens the hold of desire.

The ultimate goal of a person who has overcome Kama is Moksha, or liberation from the cycle of birth and death.

Moha is not a type of Kama mentioned in the Kama Sutra.

According to the Samkhya philosophy, Kama is the efficient cause of the universe because it is the desire of the Purusha that leads to the creation of the Prakriti.

Kama-Brahman is not a type of Kama mentioned in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad.

According to the Advaita Vedanta philosophy, Kama and Brahman are identical to each other because Kama is the desire for Brahman.

Kama-Apsara is not a type of Kama mentioned in the Mahabharata.

According to the Buddhist philosophy, Kama is the root cause of samsara because it leads to attachment and suffering.

Kama-Upadana is not a type of Kama mentioned in the Jain philosophy.

According to the Sikh philosophy, Kama and Dharma are complementary to each other because Kama provides the motivation for action, while Dharma provides the ethical framework for action.

Kama-Bhairava is not a type of Kama mentioned in the Tantric philosophy.