Existentialism, with its focus on individual freedom and responsibility, aligns with the idea that individuals with disabilities should have the autonomy to choose whether and how they participate in sports.

The social model of disability emphasizes the societal and environmental factors that create barriers for individuals with disabilities. In sports, this translates to addressing accessibility issues, discriminatory attitudes, and lack of inclusive policies.

Dignity and respect are fundamental ethical principles that require treating individuals with disabilities as valuable members of society, including in the context of sports participation.

Adaptive sports programs aim to create opportunities for individuals with disabilities to participate in sports, primarily with the goal of fostering social inclusion and breaking down barriers to participation.

Communitarianism, with its focus on the importance of community and social justice, aligns with the idea of creating a society where individuals with disabilities have equal opportunities to participate in sports.

Negative attitudes and stereotypes about individuals with disabilities are often the primary barriers to their participation in sports, creating a social and cultural environment that discourages involvement.

Justice, as an ethical principle, requires fairness and equality in the distribution of opportunities and resources, including in the context of sports participation for individuals with disabilities.

Classification systems in adaptive sports aim to create fair and equitable competition by grouping athletes with similar abilities together, ensuring that athletes compete against others with comparable skills and limitations.

Phenomenology, with its focus on understanding the subjective experiences of individuals, aligns with the idea of exploring the lived experiences of individuals with disabilities in sports, including their challenges, triumphs, and perspectives.

Disability awareness campaigns in sports aim to raise awareness about the abilities and contributions of individuals with disabilities, challenging stereotypes and promoting a more inclusive and understanding society.

Autonomy, as an ethical principle, requires respecting the right of individuals to make their own choices and decisions, including in the context of sports participation for individuals with disabilities.

Limited access to adult sports programs that are designed to meet the needs of individuals with disabilities is a significant challenge, often leading to a drop-off in participation rates as individuals transition from youth to adult sports.

Marxism, with its focus on social and economic structures, aligns with the idea of understanding the societal factors that influence sports participation for individuals with disabilities, including issues of class, power, and discrimination.

Inclusive sports programs aim to create opportunities for individuals with disabilities to participate in sports alongside individuals without disabilities, promoting social inclusion and breaking down barriers to participation.

Non-maleficence, as an ethical principle, requires avoiding harm and minimizing potential risks to individuals, including in the context of sports participation for individuals with disabilities.