0

Moral Relativism

Description: Moral relativism is the theory that moral values are not absolute but are relative to the individual or group that holds them. This means that what is considered right or wrong in one culture may be considered wrong or right in another.
Number of Questions: 5
Created by:
Tags: ethics moral relativism philosophy
Attempted 0/5 Correct 0 Score 0

What is moral relativism?

  1. The theory that moral values are absolute and unchanging.

  2. The theory that moral values are relative to the individual or group that holds them.

  3. The theory that moral values are based on reason and logic.

  4. The theory that moral values are based on emotion and feeling.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Moral relativism is the theory that moral values are not absolute but are relative to the individual or group that holds them. This means that what is considered right or wrong in one culture may be considered wrong or right in another.

What are some of the arguments in favor of moral relativism?

  1. The fact that different cultures have different moral values.

  2. The fact that moral values change over time.

  3. The fact that there is no objective way to determine what is right or wrong.

  4. All of the above.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

There are a number of arguments in favor of moral relativism. One argument is the fact that different cultures have different moral values. For example, in some cultures it is considered wrong to eat pork, while in other cultures it is considered acceptable. Another argument is the fact that moral values change over time. For example, in the past it was considered acceptable to own slaves, but today it is considered wrong. Finally, some people argue that there is no objective way to determine what is right or wrong. They argue that all moral values are subjective and that there is no way to prove that one moral value is better than another.

What are some of the arguments against moral relativism?

  1. The fact that some moral values are universal.

  2. The fact that moral values are based on reason and logic.

  3. The fact that moral values are necessary for a functioning society.

  4. All of the above.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

There are a number of arguments against moral relativism. One argument is the fact that some moral values are universal. For example, most people would agree that it is wrong to murder an innocent person. Another argument is the fact that moral values are based on reason and logic. For example, it is reasonable to say that it is wrong to steal because stealing harms others. Finally, some people argue that moral values are necessary for a functioning society. They argue that without moral values, people would not be able to cooperate with each other and society would collapse.

What are some of the implications of moral relativism?

  1. That there is no such thing as objective right or wrong.

  2. That all moral values are equally valid.

  3. That we should tolerate the moral values of other cultures, even if we disagree with them.

  4. All of the above.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Moral relativism has a number of implications. One implication is that there is no such thing as objective right or wrong. This means that there is no one right way to live and that what is considered right or wrong in one culture may be considered wrong or right in another. Another implication is that all moral values are equally valid. This means that there is no one moral value that is better than another. Finally, moral relativism implies that we should tolerate the moral values of other cultures, even if we disagree with them. This does not mean that we have to agree with the moral values of other cultures, but it does mean that we should respect them.

Is moral relativism a good theory?

  1. Yes, because it allows for diversity of moral values.

  2. No, because it undermines the idea of objective right and wrong.

  3. It depends on the context.

  4. None of the above.


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Whether or not moral relativism is a good theory depends on the context. In some contexts, it may be beneficial to allow for diversity of moral values. For example, in a multicultural society, it may be important to tolerate the moral values of other cultures, even if we disagree with them. However, in other contexts, it may be important to uphold the idea of objective right and wrong. For example, in a society where there is a lot of crime, it may be important to have laws that prohibit certain behaviors, even if some people disagree with those laws.

- Hide questions