Hasty Generalization occurs when a broad conclusion is drawn from a small sample or insufficient evidence. It assumes that a pattern observed in a few instances applies to the entire population or situation.

Appeal to Tradition is a fallacy that assumes that something is true or correct simply because it has been believed or practiced for a long time. It relies on the idea that tradition is a reliable source of knowledge, without considering whether it is based on evidence or sound reasoning.

Ad Hominem is a fallacy that involves attacking the character, motives, or personal qualities of the person making an argument, rather than addressing the validity or soundness of the argument itself. It attempts to discredit the argument by discrediting the person presenting it.

Slippery Slope is a fallacy that assumes that a series of events will inevitably follow each other in a negative or undesirable way, without providing sufficient evidence or logical reasoning to support this claim.

Straw Man is a fallacy that involves misrepresenting or exaggerating the opposing argument to make it easier to attack or dismiss. It creates a weaker version of the argument that is easier to defeat, rather than addressing the actual argument being made.

False Dilemma, also known as the Either-Or Fallacy or Black-or-White Fallacy, is a fallacy that presents only two options when there are actually more possibilities or alternatives available. It forces a choice between two extremes, ignoring other viable options.

Appeal to Ignorance is a fallacy that assumes that a proposition is true simply because it has not been proven false, or that it is false because it has not been proven true. It relies on the absence of evidence or proof as a basis for making a claim.

Affirming the Consequent is a fallacy that occurs when a conclusion is drawn based on a conditional statement, assuming that if the consequent (the 'then' part) is true, then the antecedent (the 'if' part) must also be true. However, this is not always the case.

Denying the Antecedent is a fallacy that occurs when a conclusion is drawn based on a conditional statement, assuming that if the antecedent (the 'if' part) is false, then the consequent (the 'then' part) must also be false. However, this is not always the case.

Circular Reasoning, also known as Begging the Question, is a fallacy that occurs when the conclusion of an argument is assumed in one of the premises. It involves using the conclusion as evidence to support itself, creating a circular loop of reasoning.

Appeal to Emotion is a fallacy that attempts to persuade an audience by using emotional language, imagery, or stories to evoke strong feelings, rather than presenting logical arguments or evidence.

Appeal to Authority is a fallacy that assumes that a claim is true simply because it is made by an expert or authority figure in a particular field. It relies on the authority's reputation or position as a source of knowledge, without critically evaluating the evidence or reasoning behind the claim.

Red Herring is a fallacy that involves introducing irrelevant or misleading information into an argument to divert attention away from the main issue or evidence. It attempts to sidetrack the discussion or confuse the audience, making it difficult to focus on the actual points being debated.

Non Sequitur is a fallacy that occurs when a conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. It involves a gap in the reasoning process, where the conclusion is not supported by the evidence or arguments presented.

Hasty Generalization occurs when a broad conclusion is drawn from a small sample or insufficient evidence. It assumes that a pattern observed in a few instances applies to the entire population or situation.