While deterrence, retribution, and incapacitation are all primary goals of criminal law, economic efficiency is not.

The economic analysis of crime posits that individuals weigh the costs and benefits of committing a crime before making a decision.

Psychological costs are not typically considered an economic cost of crime.

The primary goal of deterrence in criminal law is to prevent crime from occurring by discouraging potential criminals from committing crimes.

Restitution is not a type of deterrent in criminal law.

The primary goal of incapacitation in criminal law is to prevent crime from occurring by preventing criminals from committing further crimes.

Fines are not a type of incapacitation in criminal law.

The primary goal of rehabilitation in criminal law is to reduce the likelihood that criminals will commit future crimes.

Victim impact panels are not a type of rehabilitation program in criminal law.

The primary goal of compensation in criminal law is to provide financial assistance to victims of crime.

Probation is not a type of compensation in criminal law.

Economists typically do not consider the impact of a sentencing policy on the economy when analyzing its efficiency.

Return on investment analysis is not a type of economic analysis that can be used to evaluate the efficiency of a sentencing policy.

Economists typically do not consider the psychological costs of crime when analyzing its economic impact.

Hedonic pricing analysis is not a type of economic analysis that can be used to evaluate the economic impact of crime.