The Indian National Congress, led by leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Bal Gangadhar Tilak, had been advocating for greater self-governance in India. The Act was an attempt to address these demands.

Dyarchy was a system of government in which certain subjects were transferred to the control of elected Indian legislators, while others remained under the control of the British government.

The Indian Civil Service was not abolished by the Act. Instead, it was reformed to include more Indians.

The Legislative Assembly was a popularly elected body that had the power to pass laws and discuss the budget.

The Indian National Congress welcomed some aspects of the Act, such as the introduction of dyarchy, but criticized others, such as the limited franchise and the retention of British control over key subjects.

The Act had several limitations, including the limited franchise, the retention of British control over key subjects, and the communal electorates.

The Government of India Act of 1935 replaced the Government of India Act of 1919 and introduced a new system of government in India.

The Act was a landmark step in the evolution of Indian democracy as it introduced a system of dyarchy and expanded the franchise, albeit limited.

The British government's liberal policies, particularly those of Edwin Montagu, the Secretary of State for India, played a significant role in the drafting of the Act.

The Act was a reactive response to the growing demands for self-governance and the increasing influence of the Indian National Congress.

The Act was seen by many as a half-hearted attempt to address the grievances of the Indian people, as it fell short of their expectations for full self-governance.

The Act had a mixed impact on the Indian independence movement. While it provided a framework for greater Indian participation in governance, it also fell short of their aspirations for complete independence.

The Act was a significant step towards the eventual independence of India as it introduced a system of dyarchy and expanded the franchise, albeit limited.

The Act is considered a milestone in the history of Indian self-governance as it introduced a system of dyarchy and expanded the franchise, albeit limited.

The Act was a product of the British government's policy of gradual constitutional reforms in India, which aimed to gradually expand the participation of Indians in governance.